Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 22;141(3):726–735. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0362

Table 3.

—Effect of Intervention on the Individual Components of the End-of-Life Quality of Communication Scale

Itema No. Intervention Post QOC (mean, 95% CI) Control Post QOC (mean, 95% CI) Post QOC Difference (Intervention − Control) mean, 95% CI P Value
Talking about your feelings about getting sicker 243 47.0 (41.2, 52.7) 34.2 (29.4, 39.0) 12.8 (5.2, 20.4) .001
Talking about details if you got sicker 242 37.7 (32.0, 43.4) 33.3 (28.5, 38.0) 4.5 (−3.1, 12.0) .25
Talking about how long you have to live 252 22.9 (17.2, 28.5) 15.6 (9.9, 21.3) 7.2 (−0.8, 15.3) .08
Talking to you about what dying might be like 252 11.1 (6.8, 15.4) 8.4 (4.2, 12.5) 2.8 (−3.3, 8.8) .38
Involving you in discussions about your care 239 37.9 (30.0, 45.8) 33.3 (25.6, 41.0) 4.6 (−6.5, 15.8) .42
Asking you about important things in your life 246 41.4 (32.9, 50.0) 43.2 (34.6, 51.7) 1.8 (−10.4, 13.9) .78
Asking about spiritual, religious beliefs 253 18.0 (12.5, 23.5) 8.5 (3.1, 13.9) 9.4 (1.7, 17.2) .02

Statistical comparisons adjusted for baseline rating for QOC item, age, log age, current smoker, past smoker, FEV1, and clustering of patients within clinician. See Table 2 legend for expansion of abbreviation.

a

Questions are scaled 0 to 10 with 0 as the worst you could imagine and 10 as the best you could imagine.