Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2012 Jun 16;45(12):2142–2148. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.05.044

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

The distribution of the compressive stresses at the interface of the endplate and the trabecular bone along anterior-posterior direction for the distributed forces from the FE model (A and B) and the corresponding net resultant point forces (C and D). For loading via a disc, the composite behaves like a “flexible” beam on the elastic foundation (trabecular bone) with centrally distributed stresses (A and C). For loading via a PMMA layer, the composite behaves like a “rigid” beam on an elastic foundation with more uniform stresses (B and D).