Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar;27(3):687–693. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1472

Table 2.

Denosumab Treatment Effect on Total Hip BMD, and New or Worsening Vertebral and Nonvertebral Fracture Risk at 12, 24, and 36 Months

BMD Fracture


Mean (CI) Difference Mean (CI) New or worsening vertebral na New or worsening vertebral RR (CI) Nonvertebral nb Nonvertebral HR (CI)
Month 12
 Placebo 0.0 (−0.1, 0.1) 3.3 (3.1, 3.4) 82 0.39 (0.26, 0.58) 117 0.84 (0.65, 1.11)
 Denosumab 3.2 (3.1, 3.3) 32 99
Month 24
 Placebo −0.7 (−0.8, −0.6) 5.1 (4.9, 5.2) 183 0.29 (0.21, 0.39) 214 0.79 (0.64, 0.96)
 Denosumab 4.4 (4.3, 4.5) 53 170
Month 36
 Placebo −1.4 (−1.5, −1.3) 6.4 (6.2, 6.6) 264 0.32 (0.26, 0.41) 293 0.80 (0.67, 0.95)
 Denosumab 5.0 (4.9, 5.1) 86 238

n = number of subjects with ≥1 fracture; CI = 95% confidence interval; RR = risk ratio; HR = hazard ratio.

a

There were 3691 women in the placebo group and 3702 in the denosumab group who were evaluable for new or worsening vertebral fractures.

b

There were 3906 women in the placebo group and and 3902 women in the denosumab group who were evaluable for nonvertebral fractures.Difference and ratios reference placebo.