Table 2.
Denosumab Treatment Effect on Total Hip BMD, and New or Worsening Vertebral and Nonvertebral Fracture Risk at 12, 24, and 36 Months
BMD | Fracture | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (CI) | Difference Mean (CI) | New or worsening vertebral na | New or worsening vertebral RR (CI) | Nonvertebral nb | Nonvertebral HR (CI) | |
Month 12 | ||||||
Placebo | 0.0 (−0.1, 0.1) | 3.3 (3.1, 3.4) | 82 | 0.39 (0.26, 0.58) | 117 | 0.84 (0.65, 1.11) |
Denosumab | 3.2 (3.1, 3.3) | 32 | 99 | |||
Month 24 | ||||||
Placebo | −0.7 (−0.8, −0.6) | 5.1 (4.9, 5.2) | 183 | 0.29 (0.21, 0.39) | 214 | 0.79 (0.64, 0.96) |
Denosumab | 4.4 (4.3, 4.5) | 53 | 170 | |||
Month 36 | ||||||
Placebo | −1.4 (−1.5, −1.3) | 6.4 (6.2, 6.6) | 264 | 0.32 (0.26, 0.41) | 293 | 0.80 (0.67, 0.95) |
Denosumab | 5.0 (4.9, 5.1) | 86 | 238 |
n = number of subjects with ≥1 fracture; CI = 95% confidence interval; RR = risk ratio; HR = hazard ratio.
There were 3691 women in the placebo group and 3702 in the denosumab group who were evaluable for new or worsening vertebral fractures.
There were 3906 women in the placebo group and and 3902 women in the denosumab group who were evaluable for nonvertebral fractures.Difference and ratios reference placebo.