Table 1.

Relative transcript abundances of EIIB and manL in the wild-type and mutant strains grown in different sugars^a

Strain or genotype	EIIBb			manLc
	Glu	Glu + Gal	Gal	Glu	Glu + Gal	Gal
WTd	0.64 ± 0.12	1.32 ± 0.03	8.77 ± 1.38	0.92 ± 0.12	0.85 ± 0.09	0.71 ± 0.02
ccpA	3.66 ± 0.37f	6.68 ± 0.19f	35.27 ± 3.61e	1.29 ± 0.13	1.73 ± 0.15e	1.28 ± 0.14e
manL	6.34 ± 0.92f	6.58 ± 0.29f	1.45 ± 0.10e	NDg	ND	ND
ccpA-manL	8.17 ± 0.24f	10.25 ± 0.54f	12.32 ± 1.27e	ND	ND	ND
hprK	0.86 ± 0.02	4.71 ± 0.35f	3.58 ± 0.10f	ND	ND	ND
ccpA-hprK	3.25 ± 0.13f	131.97 ± 2.31f	56.63 ± 2.56f	ND	ND	ND

^aData are the averages of three independent cultures.

^bThe transcription abundance is the mean ± standard deviation of the EIIB copy number/0.0001 16S rRNA gene copies.

^cThe transcription abundance is the mean ± standard deviation of the manL copy number/0.01 16S rRNA gene copies.

^dWT, wild type.

^eValues with significant difference from the wild type (P < 0.05; Student's t test).

^fValues with significant difference from the wild type (P < 0.01; Student's t test).

^gND, not done.