Table 3.
Relationship of BAPS groups and STsa
| BAPS group | STs |
|---|---|
| 1 | 19, 31, 43, 44, 57 |
| 2 | 29, 5, 6, 396, 397, 402 |
| 3 | 1, 2, 403 |
| 4 | 12, 13, 54, 221, 235, 317, 390 |
| 5 | 7, 11, 30, 45, 58, 59, 314, 407, 408 |
| 6 | 8, 9, 10, 36, 56, 222, 238, 302, 305, 306, 313, 316, 391, 404 |
| 7 | 3, 4, 32, 55, 308 |
| 8 | 14, 16, 17, 34, 38, 39, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 226, 300, 301, 307, 311, 315, 333, 393, 394, 395, 400, 401, 405, 406 |
| 9 | 18, 37, 46, 47, 223, 309, 392 |
| 10 | 398, 399 |
a
The genetic relationship of B. burgdorferi samples from North America was analyzed using a Bayesian approach (BAPS) which divided the STs into 10 groups. A comparison of BAPS groups and goeBurst clonal complexes is shown in Fig. 4.