Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep;78(17):6103–6112. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01245-12

Table 2.

Comparison of the observed and predicted lag times of B. cereus inoculated on cooked foods

Food pH NaCl (%) Temp (°C) Lag time (h)
Observeda Predictedb [95% PIc] CBPd PMPe Reference 25f
Freeze-dried tofu 6.92 1.7 15 16.5 13.2 [4.0–42.3] 24.5 23.0 22.3
10 28.3 32.6 [10.0–105.9] 52.4 103.7 70.3
Freeze-dried tofu, lightly salted 7.09 0.40 15 6.1 8.4 [2.6–27.3] 22.1 14.4 9.8
10 7.2 20.8 [6.4–67.4] 53.2 61.2 37.7
Satoimo (taro) 5.49 0.49 15 8.2 14.2 [4.3–46.0] 32.6 18.1 20.5
10 22.9 35.0 [10.8–113.6] 63.0 69.6 77.6
Pumpkin 6.18 0.57 15 7.8 11.8 [3.6–38.1] 27.6 12.2 13.6
10 35.7 28.9 [8.9–94.1] 62.3 49.4 51.0
Okara (soy pulp) 6.37 1.25 15 15.4 13.7 [4.2–44.3] 27.4 15.6 20.1
10 30.8 33.7 [10.3–109.4] 61.3 66.7 67.8
Burdock root and carrot 5.72 1.45 15 29.6 17.8 [5.4–57.7] 34.2 20.0 32.1
10 53.2 43.7 [13.4–142.3] 73.2 83.2 104.9
pREg 0.75 0.25 0.33 0.33
a

Estimated by fitting growth curve using DMFit.

b

Predicted value at P = 0.5.

c

PI, prediction interval.

d

Prediction by the ComBase predictor (physiological state value was set as default: 0.000611).

e

Prediction by the Pathogen Modeling Program.

f

Prediction by the model of Ölmez and Aran.

g

Proportion of relative error (pRE) in the acceptable prediction zone of lag time (−0.3 to 0.6).