. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 21.

Published in final edited form as: J Theor Biol. 2011 Nov 25;295:116–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.11.014

Table 2.

Latin hypercube sampling.

Hierarchy	Signal = 0.001 s⁻¹	Signal = 0.01 s⁻¹	Signal = 0.1 s⁻¹	Signal = 1 s⁻¹
Hierarchy	Fold = 3 (10)	Fold = 3 (10)	Fold = 3 (10)	Fold = 3 (10)
(H1) R_cyt–₁₁ > R_{scaff –}₁₁ > R_{scaff –}₂₂ > R_cyt–₂₂	74 (59)%	74 (48)%	59 (38)%	46 (28)%
(H2) R_{scaff –}₁₁ > R_cyt–₁₁ > R_{scaff –}₂₂ > R_cyt–₂₂	18 (13)%	16 (16)%	16 (13)%	16 (13)%
(H3) R_{scaff –}₁₁ > R_{scaff –}₂₂ > R_cyt–₁₁ > R_cyt–₂₂	8 (25)%	9 (25)%	12 (26)%	11 (28)%
(H4) R_cyt–₁₁ > R_{scaff –}₁₁ > R_cyt–₂₂ > R_{scaff –}₂₂	0 (1)%	1 (5)%	8 (8)%	14 (9)%
(H5) R_cyt–₁₁ > R_cyt–₂₂ > R_{scaff –}₁₁ > R_{scaff –}₂₂	0 (1)%	0 (5)%	6 (15)%	12 (22)%