Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 26;29(34):10671–10682. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1141-09.2009

Table 1.

Metrics of attentional modulation curves for low-contrast and high-contrast trials

MAM Cue MAM/Target MAM Last frame at 75% MAM
Low contrast
    V1–V4 0.26 (0.07) 0.87 (0.01) 8.8 (0.2)
    V1 0.14 (0.02) 1.08 (0.06) 6.3 (0.6)
    V2 0.20 (0.05) 0.98 (0.05) 8.0 (0.4)
    VP 0.29 (0.08) 0.81 (0.05) 8.8 (0.5)
    V4 0.32 (0.08) 0.74 (0.06) 8.8 (0.2)
    V3A 0.14 (0.05) 0.98 (0.04) 8.2 (0.2)
    FEF 0.06 (0.01) 1.22 (0.07) 6.7 (0.3)
    IPS 0.09 (0.03) 1.35 (0.19) 6.6 (1.2)
High contrast
    V1–V4 0.19 (0.06) 0.90 (0.09) 8.7 (0.4)
    V1 0.12 (0.02) 0.96 (0.06) 6.7 (0.6)
    V2 0.16 (0.04) 0.93 (0.09) 8.2 (0.4)
    VP 0.19 (0.08) 0.90 (0.16) 7.8 (0.8)
    V4 0.23 (0.06) 0.74 (0.07) 9.3 (0.3)
    V3A 0.11 (0.04) 0.91 (0.05) 7.8 (0.3)
    FEF 0.05 (0.01) 1.22 (0.08) 6.5 (0.3)
    IPS 0.08 (0.01) 1.28 (0.39) 5.4 (0.7)

Metrics were computed separately for each subject and then averaged across subjects. For the ratio of cue to target MAM, the subjects with the highest and lowest ratios were excluded before averaging. Errors, in parentheses, are SEM. MAM, Maximal attentional modulation, the maximal difference (in % BOLD change) between attend-contralateral versus attend-ipsilateral trials, at any one time point over the course of the trial.