Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Apr 2;141(4):682–698. doi: 10.1037/a0027822

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Scatter plots showing significant correlations for the PE group between behavioral improvement in shape matching (indicated by the difference in noise level for 80% matching accuracy for trained and novel object categories after training) and category selectivity during shape matching (defined by the Category × Training contrast) in the left middle temporal area (A), LFFA (B), LLO (C) and RPG (D).