Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 31;2012:501807. doi: 10.1100/2012/501807

Table 2.

Association between inconsistent condom use, socioeconomic factors, health status, and alcohol use.

Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted ORa,b (95% CI)
Socioeconomic factors
 Age 1.02 (1.02–1.03)∗∗∗ 1.00 (0.99–1.01)
 Male versus female 1.13 (1.00–1.28) 0.96 (0.75–1.24)
 Never married 1.00 1.00
 Married/cohabitating 1.30 (1.11–1.52)∗∗∗ 1.66 (1.25–2.20)∗∗∗
 Separated/divorced/widowed 2.73 (1.91–3.90)∗∗∗ 3.67 (1.85–7.29)∗∗∗
 Grade 7 or less 1.00 1.00
 Grade 8–11 0.63 (0.54–0.74)∗∗∗ 0.72 (0.53–0.99)
 Grade 12 or more 0.58 (0.48–0.69)∗∗∗ 0.66 (0.46–0.94)∗∗

Poverty index
 Low 1.00 1.00
 Medium 1.38 (1.20–1.59)∗∗∗ 1.60 (1.24–2.20)∗∗∗
 High 1.98 (1.62–2.43)∗∗∗ 1.54 (1.05–2.25)
 Black African 1.00
 Coloured 1.17 (0.96–1.43)
 Indian, Asian, White, other 1.16 (0.74–1.81)

Health status
 HIV positive versus negative 0.86 (0.75–0.99) 0.96 (0.72–1.28)
 Ever STI 1.38 (1.07–177) 1.10 (0.72–1.67)
 New TB versus retreatment 1.02 (0.88–1.19)

Perceived health status
 Excellent/very good 1.00
 Good 0.94 (0.78–1.12)
 Fair/poor 0.99 (0.83–1.17)
 Severe psychological distress 1.26 (1.09–1.47)∗∗ 1.21 (0.92–1.59)
 On ART 0.60 (0.51–0.70)∗∗∗ 0.79 (0.58–1.08)
 Disclosed HIV status to last partner 0.32 (0.28–0.37)∗∗∗ 0.34 (0.25–0.48)∗∗∗
 Partner HIV unknown or negative versus positive 1.60 (1.39–1.84)∗∗∗ 1.18 (0.87–2.12)
 Sexual partner on ART 0.41 (0.33–0.50)∗∗∗ 0.38 (0.23–0.60)∗∗∗

Alcohol use
AUDIT
 Abstinent or Low risk (0–7) 1.00 1.00
 High risk (8–19) 1.38 (1.16–1.64)∗∗∗ 1.14 (0.82–1.58)
 Probably alcohol dependent (20–40) 2.03 (1.52–2.71)∗∗∗ 1.44 (0.86–2.42)
 Alcohol before sex 1.22 (1.12–1.32)∗∗∗ 1.08 (0.78–1.50)
 Partner alcohol before sex 1.33 (1.21–1.46)∗∗∗ 1.56 (1.30–1.90)∗∗∗

aUsing “enter” LR selection of variables.

bHosmer and Lemeshow Chi-square 7.16, df 8, 0.516; Cox and Snell R 2 0.15; Nagelkerke R 2 0.20.

P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.