Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 1;96(3):552–559. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.031567

TABLE 3.

Associations between intake of AS and SS beverages during pregnancy and PTD subgroups in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study1

AS beverages
SS beverages
All PTD Adjusted OR2(95% CI) All PTD Adjusted OR2(95% CI)
All preterm delivery (<37 wk) n % n %
 Never 22,229 5.0 ± 0.153 1 6155 4.7 ± 0.27 1
 <1 serving/wk 14,919 5.1 ± 0.18 1.01 (0.92, 1.12) 18,082 5.2 ± 0.17 1.15 (1.00, 1.32)
 1–6 servings/wk 13,204 5.4 ± 0.20 1.09 (0.98, 1.20) 24,906 5.2 ± 0.14 1.16 (1.01, 1.32)
 ≥1 serving/d 10,409 5.7 ± 0.23 1.11 (1.00, 1.24) 11,618 5.7 ± 0.22 1.25 (1.08, 1.45)
 P-trend4 0.025 0.009
Late preterm delivery (34 to <37 wk)
 Never 21,929 3.7 ± 0.13 1 6090 3.7 ± 0.24 1
 <1 serving/wk 14,733 3.9 ± 0.16 1.05 (0.94, 1.18) 17,818 3.8 ± 0.14 1.07 (0.91, 1.25)
 1–6 servings/wk 13,017 4.1 ± 0.17 1.11 (0.99, 1.24) 24,590 3.9 ± 0.12 1.12 (0.96, 1.30)
 ≥1 serving/d 10,255 4.3 ± 0.20 1.14 (1.00,1.29) 11,436 4.2 ± 0.19 1.17 (0.99, 1.39)
 P-trend4 0.022 0.046
Moderately preterm delivery (32 to <34 wk)
 Never 21,276 0.8 ± 0.06 1 5904 0.6 ± 0.10 1
 <1 serving/wk 14,261 0.7 ± 0.07 0.89 (0.69, 1.14) 17,275 0.8 ± 0.07 1.34 (0.93, 1.94)
 1–6 servings/wk 12,580 0.7 ± 0.08 0.92 (0.71, 1.20) 23,789 0.7 ± 0.05 1.22 (0.84, 1.75)
 ≥1 serving/d 9897 0.8 ± 0.09 1.03 (0.78, 1.35) 11,046 0.8 ± 0.09 1.41 (0.95, 2.11)
 P-trend4 0.997 0.282
Early preterm delivery (<32 wk)
 Never 21,248 0.6 ± 0.06 1 5895 0.5 ± 0.09 1
 <1 serving/wk 14,247 0.6 ± 0.07 0.94 (0.71, 1.23) 17,259 0.7 ± 0.06 1.56 (1.03, 2.36)
 1–6 servings/wk 12,585 0.8 ± 0.08 1.17 (0.90, 1.53) 23,769 0.6 ± 0.05 1.37 (0.91, 2.07)
 ≥1 serving/d 9885 0.7 ± 0.09 1.06 (0.79, 1.42) 11,042 0.8 ± 0.09 1.75 (1.13, 2.73)
 P-trend4 0.396 0.081
1

ORs were calculated by using logistic regression models. AS, artificially sweetened; PTD, preterm delivery; SS, sugar-sweetened.

2

Adjusted for previous preterm delivery, maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, height, total energy intake, marital status, parity, smoking during pregnancy, education, and the other type of beverage.

3

Percentage ± SE (all such values).

4

P values for linear trend were obtained by incorporating the variable as a linear term in logistic regression models.