Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 1;96(3):640–646. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.034751

TABLE 1.

Linear trends in prevalence of consumption of sources of LCSs from 1999–2000 to 2007–2008 among children and adolescents (2 to 17 y of age) by demographic and weight subgroups1

Any item with LCS Reduced-calorie beverage No-calorie beverage Condiment with LCS Dessert with LCS
% % % % %
Total
 All children
  1999–2000 (n = 3334) 8.7 ± 0.9 1.0 ± 0.3 5.3 ± 0.7 0.7 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 0.2
  2007–2008 (n = 2839) 15.0 ± 1.2* 7.4 ± 0.8**** 6.1 ± 0.9 1.7 ± 0.4 1.1 ± 0.4
 Male
  1999–2000 (n = 1700) 6.8 ± 0.7 0.7 ± 0.3 3.5 ± 0.5 0.6 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.3
  2007–2008 (n = 1465) 12.2 ± 1.1 6.7 ± 0.9** 3.7 ± 0.5 1.37 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.3
 Female
  1999–2000 (n = 1634) 8.5 ± 0.7 1.0 ± 0.2 4.8 ± 0.5 0.9 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.1
  2007–2008 (n = 1374) 13.6 ± 0.8* 6.7 ± 0.6**** 4.8 ± 0.5 1.7 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.4
Age
 2 to 5 y
  1999–2000 (n = 665) 7.0 ± 0.9 0.8 ± 0.4 3.3 ± 0.8 0.3 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.4
  2007–2008 (n = 832) 11.9 ± 2.0 6.5 ± 1.1 2.9 ± 0.8 1.6 ± 0.5 1.4 ± 0.6
 6 to 11 y
  1999–2000 (n = 961) 7.0 ± 0.8 0.2 ± 0.2 4.1 ± 0.6 0.2 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.4
  2007–2008 (n = 1121) 13.7 ± 0.9* 6.9 ± 0.8**** 4.6 ± 0.5 1.5 ± 0.3*** 1.3 ± 0.4
 12 to 17 y
  1999–2000 (n = 1708) 8.3 ± 0.7 1.3 ± 0.3 4.6 ± 0.5 1.2 ± 0.4 0.70 ± 0.2
  2007–2008 (n = 886) 12.9 ± 1.6 6.7 ± 1.01 5.1 ± 1.2 1.5 ± 0.5 1.0 ± 0.3
Race
 White
  1999–2000 (n = 730) 11.9 ± 1.4 1.5 ± 0.5 7.3 ± 1.0 1.1 ± 0.5 1.0 ± 0.3
  2007–2008 (n = 902) 16.4 ± 1.2 6.9 ± 0.7** 7.4 ± 1.0 1.9 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.6
 Black
  1999–2000 (n = 929) 5.6 ± 0.9 0.6 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.4
  2007–2008 (n = 721) 11.1 ± 1.3 7.8 ± 0.9**** 1.9 ± 0.7 0.7 ± 0.3**** 1.0 ± 0.4
 Hispanic
  1999–2000 (n = 1526) 6.6 ± 0.5 0.7 ± 0.2 4.1 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.2
  2007–2008 (n = 1076) 11.0 ± 0.0 5.2 ± 0.8** 3.3 ± 0.7 2.0 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.5
Weight status
 Normal weight
  1999–2000 (n = 1811) 7.0 ± 0.8 0.8 ± 0.2 3.9 ± 0.5 0.7 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.3
  2007–2008 (n = 1433) 11.9 ± 1.2* 6.2 ± 0.6**** 3.9 ± 0.8 1.1 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.4
 Overweight
  1999–2000 (n = 469) 8.1 ± 1.3 1.5 ± 0.7 3.2 ± 0.7 1.1 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.5
  2007–2008 (n = 373) 15.6 ± 1.5* 7.8 ± 1.3 5.4 ± 1.0 2.4 ± 0.7 1.3 ± 0.6
 Obese
  1999–2000 (n = 592) 10.3 ± 1.4 1.2 ± 0.5 6.8 ± 1.1 0.8 ± 0.4 1.0 ± 0.6
  2007–2008 (n = 531) 17.0 ± 1.5 8.8 ± 1.1 6.6 ± 0.9 2.0 ± 0.7**** 1.6 ± 0.5
Income
 Low
  1999–2000 (n = 1869) 7.0 ± 0.7 0.7 ± 0.2 3.5 ± 0.5 0.7 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 0.2
  2007–2008 (n = 1427) 11.0 ± 0.8 6.0 ± 0.6**** 2.8 ± 0.5 1.3 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.4
 Middle
  1999–2000 (n = 861) 6.7 ± 0.9 0.8 ± 0.3 3.7 ± 0.8 0.7 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.2
  2007–2008 (n = 834) 14.5 ± 1.6 7.0 ± 1.1* 4.9 ± 0.9 1.8 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.6
 High
  1999–2000 (n = 574) 11.2 ± 1.8 1.6 ± 0.7 7.0 ± 1.20 1.1 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 0.2
  2007–2008 (n = 577) 15.3 ± 1.5 8.2 ± 1.2* 6.8 ± 1.07 1.7 ± 0.5 0.5 ± 0.3
1

All values are means ± SEs. The data were collected from one 24-h dietary recall. Linear trends in prevalence of consumption of each source of low-calorie sweeteners were analyzed by using logistic regression. The prevalence of consumption of LCSs was assessed by using frequency procedures for complex survey design. LCSs include reduced-calorie drinks (eg, light fruit juices and diet lemonade); no-calorie drinks (eg, diet soda and sugar-free flavored water beverages), low-calorie desserts (eg, sugar-free ice cream and sugar-free pudding), low-calorie condiments (eg, reduced-sugar ketchup and sugar-free pancake syrup), and other low-calorie foods (eg, light yogurt and no-sugar-added canned peaches). *P-trend < 0.05, **P-trend < 0.01, ***P-trend <0.001, ****P-trend < 0.0001. LCS, low-calorie sweetener.