Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 1;96(3):640–646. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.034751

TABLE 2.

Linear trends in prevalence of consumption of sources of low-calorie sweeteners from 1999–2000 to 2007–2008 among adults by demographic and weight subgroup1

Any item with LCS Reduced-calorie beverage No-calorie beverage Condiment with LCS Dessert with LCS
% % % % %
Total
 All adults
  1999–2000 (n = 4736) 26.9 ± 1.0 2.1 ± 0.2 17.2 ± 1.2 10.4 ± 0.8 1.4 ± 0.3
  2007–2008 (n = 5690) 32.0 ± 1.1** 8.1 ± 0.8**** 18.6 ± 0.9 12.4 ± 0.6 2.0 ± 0.3*
 Male
  1999–2000 (n = 2218) 21.4 ± 0.9 1.8 ± 0.3 1.7 ± 0.8 9.8 ± 0.7 1.2 ± 0.3
  2007–2008 (n = 2809) 25.1 ± 1.3 6.0 ± 0.5** 13.8 ± 0.9 10.8 ± 0.9 1.9 ± 0.2*
 Female
  1999–2000 (n = 2518) 25.4 ± 1.0 2.1 ± 0.2 14.5 ± 0.9 11.2 ± 1.0 1.6 ± 0.2
  2007–2008 (n = 2881) 32.9 ± 1.3** 8.3 ± 0.7**** 15.6 ± 1.1 15.2 ± 0.7* 1.9 ± 0.3
Age
 18 to 34 y
  1999–2000 (n = 1635) 11.0 ± 0.8 1.0 ± 0.2 7.2 ± 0.6 2.6 ± 0.6 0.4 ± 0.1
  2007–2008 (n = 1530) 15.5 ± 1.3 5.0 ± 0.8** 9.2 ± 0.2 3.5 ± 0.4 0.4 ± 0.2
 35 to 54 y
  1999–2000 (n = 1343) 26.6 ± 1.4 1.9 ± 0.3 18.2 ± 1.3 9.4 ± 0.8 0.7 ± 0.2
  2007–2008 (n = 1845) 28.7 ± 1.6 6.4 ± 0.7*** 17.1 ± 1.5 11.8 ± 0.8 0.8 ± 0.2
 ≥55 y
  1999–2000 (n = 1758) 32.9 ± 1.2 2.8 ± 0.4 14.9 ± 0.8 18.8 ± 1.3 3.0 ± 0.2
  2007–2008 (n = 2315) 38.2 ± 1.1 9.2 ± 0.6**** 16.3 ± 1.0 20.3 ± 1.1 3.7 ± 0.4***
Race
 White
  1999–2000 (n = 2730) 31.6 ± 1.1 2.6 ± 0.3 19.2 ± 1.4 13.6 ± 1.1 2.0 ± 0.3
  2007–2008 (n = 3539) 35.7 ± 0.9 8.4 ± 0.8**** 20.1 ± 0.8 14.7 ± 1.3 2.7 ± 0.2*
 Black
  1999–2000 (n = 1884) 15.7 ± 1.5 2.7 ± 0.6 6.2 ± 0.9 9.2 ± 1.5 0.8 ± 0.2
  2007–2008 (n = 1924) 22.4 ± 1.4* 6.9 ± 0.6 8.8 ± 1.0* 10.4 ± 0.7 1.3 ± 0.3
 Hispanic
  1999–2000 (n = 3207) 18.7 ± 1.6 1.0 ± 0.3 10.3 ± 0.9 7.7 ± 1.0 1.3 ± 0.3
  2007–2008 (n = 2701) 24.5 ± 1.3*** 5.5 ± 0.5*** 10.8 ± 1.3 13.1 ± 1.0**** 1.1 ± 0.4
Weight status
 Normal weight
  1999–2000 (n = 2809) 17.3 ± 1.4 1.4 ± 0.3 9.2 ± 1.2 7.6 ± 1.0 1.0 ± 0.2
  2007–2008 (n = 2443) 21.5 ± 1.3 5.5 ± 0.7**** 10.0 ± 0.9 9.3 ± 0.8 1.3 ± 0.3
 Overweight
  1999–2000 (n = 1944) 25.0 ± 0.8 1.8 ± 0.4 14.1 ± 0.8 11.1 ± 0.8 1.8 ± 0.4
  2007–2008 (n = 2160) 29.5 ± 1.6 7.0 ± 0.5** 14.6 ± 1.4 13.1 ± 1.0 2.0 ± 0.3
 Obese
  1999–2000 (n = 1701) 29.5 ± 1.4 2.7 ± 0.4 16.8 ± 1.1 13.2 ± 1.3 1.5 ± 0.3
  2007–2008 (n = 2164) 35.9 ± 1.4* 9.0 ± 0.9**** 19.1 ± 1.0 16.6 ± 0.8 2.1 ± 0.3***
Income
 Low
  1999–2000 (n = 3942) 18.7 ± 1.4 1.2 ± 0.2 9.4 ± 1.0 9.1 ± 0.9 1.1 ± 0.2
  2007–2008 (n = 3630) 22.9 ± 1.4 5.8 ± 0.5**** 10.8 ± 1.0 10.2 ± 0.7 1.7 ± 0.3**
 Middle
  1999–2000(n = 2274) 23.0 ± 1.4 2.2 ± 0.3 12.6 ± 0.8 10.4 ± 1.1 1.5 ± 0.4
  2007–2008 (n = 2610) 27.6 ± 1.7 6.8 ± 0.7** 12.7 ± 1.2 12.1 ± 1.0 2.2 ± 0.3**
 High
  1999–2000 (n = 1854) 32.0 ± 1.4 3.0 ± 0.6 20.0 ± 1.3 13.1 ± 1.4 1.9 ± 0.5
  2007–2008 (n = 2289) 38.3 ± 1.4* 9.4 ± 1.2*** 21.8 ± 1.0 17.6 ± 1.1 1.8 ± 0.3
1

All values are means ± SEs. Data were collected from one 24-h dietary recall. Linear trends in prevalence of consumption of each source of LCSs were analyzed by using logistic regression. The prevalence of consumption of LCSs was assessed by using frequency procedures for complex survey design. LCSs include reduced-calorie drinks (eg, light fruit juices and diet lemonade); no-calorie drinks (eg, diet soda and sugar-free flavored water beverages), low-calorie desserts (eg, sugar-free ice cream and sugar-free pudding), low-calorie condiments (eg, reduced-sugar ketchup and sugar-free pancake syrup), and other low-calorie foods (eg, light yogurt and no-sugar-added canned peaches). *P-trend < 0.05, **P-trend < 0.01, ***P-trend < 0.001, ****P-trend < 0.0001. LCS, low-calorie sweetener.