Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jun 30;18(7):1953–1961. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0620

Table 2. Comprehension and information processing of GSTM1 genetic test results delivered online among smokers related to patients with lung cancer.

Outcomes Test result

GSTM1-present (lower risk) GSTM1-missing (higher risk) Difference
Immediately after receiving genetic test results (online Session 2)
Accurate comprehension, n (%)
 Accurate recall of test result 22 (100) 22 (100) NS
 Accurate interpretation of test result 12 (55) 22 (100) χ2 = 12.94;df = 1; P < 0.001
Acceptability of test information*
 Believable 1.23 (0.52) 1.55 (0.60) NS
 Trustworthy 1.27 (0.55) 1.50 (0.60) NS
 Easy to understand 1.32 (0.65) 1.45 (0.60) NS
 Relevant 1.32 (0.65) 1.45 (0.60) NS
 Important 1.23 (0.53) 1.41 (0.59) NS
Processing of genetic test – related information
 Viewed strengths information page, n (%) 11 (50) 7 (32) NS
 Viewed weaknesses information page, n (%) 10 (45) 8 (37) NS
 Total no. of information pages viewed 3.1 (2.6) 2.6 (2.7) NS
6-mo Follow-up
Accurate comprehension, n (%)
 Accurate recall of test result 18 (100) 16 (100) NS
 Accurate interpretation of test result 10 (56) 15 (94) χ2 = 6.35; df = 1; P = 0.011
Decisional outcomes
 Regret decision to take genetic test 0 (0%) 0 (0%) NS
 Satisfied with decision to take genetic test 17 (100%) 16 (94%) NS

NOTE: Values represent means (SDs) unless otherwise indicated.

Abbreviation: NS, not significant.

*

Possible scores range from 1 to 7; lower scores indicate more positive and higher acceptability responses (e.g., 1 = believable), and higher scores indicate more negative responses or lower acceptability (e.g., 7 = unbelievable).

Measured using a seven-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree); values shown are proportions who gave responses of 4 to 7, that is, who somewhat to strongly agreed with statement.