Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun;34(6):330–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2012.01363.x

Table 2.

Results from a repeated measures general linear model (GLM) analysis of the variations in antibody levels

Dependent pair (pre- and post-treatment) Time F (P) Time*sex F (P) Time*age F (P) Time*village F (P) Time*infection intensity F (P) Time*PZQ treatment F (P)
Anti-schistosome responses
 SWAP IgE 77·178 (<0·001) 0·040 (0·842) f<m 0·108 (0·898) 13·925 (<0·001)H > L 19·561 (<0·001) 5·558 (0·019)T > U
 SWAP IgG4 49·485 (<0·001) 2·077 (0·15) f < m 11·024 (<0·001) 0·354 (0·552)H > L 26·952 (<0·001) 0·209 (0·648)T > U
 SWAP IgE/IgG4 4·72 (0·031) 0·558 (0·455)f > m 1·778 (0·171) 0·095 (0·758)H > L 1·052 (0·306) 4·342 (0·038)T > U
 SEA-IgE 5·00 (0·026) 1·315 (0·252)f < m 5·828 (0·003) 50·299 (<0·001)H > L 15·534 (<0·001) 3·193 (0·075)T < U
 SEA-IgG4 0·323 (0·57) 0·279 (0·597)f < m 0·321 (0·726) 2·638 (0·105)H > L 6·086 (0·014) 2·368 (0·125)T > U
 SEA-IgE/IgG4 2·070 (0·151) 0·44 (0·508) f > m 1·378 (0·254) 36·535 (<0·001)H < L 1·586 (0·209) 1·041 (0·308)T < U
Anti-allergen responses
 Derp1-IgE 47·238 (<0·001) 6·281 (0·013)f > m 6·939 (0·001) 6·382 (0·012)H < L 0·009 (0·926) 4·902 (0·028)T > U
 Derp1-IgG4 42·278 (<0·001) 3·548 (0·061)f < m 13·72 (<0·001) 34·706 (<0·001)H < L 1·783 (0·183) 0·768 (0·382)T < U
 Derp1-IgE/IgG4 34·963 (<0·001) 0·271 (0·603)f > m 4·347 (0·014) 15·063 (<0·001)H > L 3·786 (0·053) 3·414 (0·066)T < U

F (and P) values from repeated measures GLM analysis of the parameters explaining the variations in antibody responses (and ratios) over time (time here stands for the 6 weeks between pre- and post-treatment collection day). Significant P-values <0·05 are highlighted in bold. SWAP, soluble worm antigen preparation; SEA, soluble egg antigen; Derp1, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus allergen 1; PZQ, praziquantel; f, female; m, male; H, high infection area; L, low infection area; T, treated; U: untreated.