Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
. 2011 Dec 9;1:15. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2011.00015

Burkholderia cenocepacia Differential Gene Expression during Host–Pathogen Interactions and Adaptation to the Host Environment

Eoin P O’Grady 1, Pamela A Sokol 1,*
PMCID: PMC3417382  PMID: 22919581

Abstract

Members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) are important in medical, biotechnological, and agricultural disciplines. These bacteria naturally occur in soil and water environments and have adapted to survive in association with plants and animals including humans. All Bcc species are opportunistic pathogens including Burkholderia cenocepacia that causes infections in cystic fibrosis and chronic granulomatous disease patients. The adaptation of B. cenocepacia to the host environment was assessed in a rat chronic respiratory infection model and compared to that of high cell-density in vitro grown cultures using transcriptomics. The distribution of genes differentially expressed on chromosomes 1, 2, and 3 was relatively proportional to the size of each genomic element, whereas the proportion of plasmid-encoded genes differentially expressed was much higher relative to its size and most genes were induced in vivo. The majority of genes encoding known virulence factors, components of types II and III secretion systems and chromosome 2-encoded type IV secretion system were similarly expressed between in vitro and in vivo environments. Lower expression in vivo was detected for genes encoding N-acyl-homoserine lactone synthase CepI, orphan LuxR homolog CepR2, zinc metalloproteases ZmpA and ZmpB, LysR-type transcriptional regulator ShvR, nematocidal protein AidA, and genes associated with flagellar motility, Flp type pilus formation, and type VI secretion. Plasmid-encoded type IV secretion genes were markedly induced in vivo. Additional genes induced in vivo included genes predicted to be involved in osmotic stress adaptation or intracellular survival, metal ion, and nutrient transport, as well as those encoding outer membrane proteins. Genes identified in this study are potentially important for virulence during host–pathogen interactions and may be associated with survival and adaptation to the host environment during chronic lung infections.

Keywords: Burkholderia cenocepacia, Burkholderia cepacia complex, microarray, lung infection, rat chronic respiratory infection model, in vitro, in vivo

Introduction

Members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) are commonly found in soil and aquatic environments (LiPuma, 2010; Loutet and Valvano, 2010). Seventeen Bcc species have been identified, all of which have the potential to be opportunistic pathogens, although Burkholderia cenocepacia is the most clinically significant. B. cenocepacia causes lung infections resulting in significantly decreased survival rates in cystic fibrosis and chronic granulomatous disease patients (Mahenthiralingam et al., 2005). The organism is intrinsically multidrug resistant and can persist in the lungs of CF patients for many years (Mahenthiralingam et al., 2008). In some patients, infection with B. cenocepacia can progress to what is termed “cepacia syndrome.” Cepacia syndrome is associated with a rapid deterioration in lung function associated with necrotizing pneumonia, bacteremia and sepsis that can result in death (Isles et al., 1984).

Many virulence factors have been identified in B. cenocepacia including extracellular enzymes, toxins, secretions systems, iron acquisition systems, cell–cell communication (quorum sensing, QS) systems, regulatory proteins as well as genes contributing to motility, biofilm formation, adhesion, cell invasion, intracellular survival, and bacterial protection from host factors (for review see Loutet and Valvano, 2010). Several infection models have been employed to identify and characterize the contribution of numerous genes to pathogenesis (Uehlinger et al., 2009). B. cenocepacia exhibits virulence against Caenorhabditis elegans (Kothe et al., 2003), Galleria mellonella (Seed and Dennis, 2008), Acanthamoeba (Marolda et al., 1999), Dictyostelium discoideum (Aubert et al., 2008), Danio rerio (Vergunst et al., 2010), Drosophila melanogaster (Castonguay-Vanier et al., 2010), and alfalfa seedlings (Bernier et al., 2003). Chronic respiratory infection models have been developed in mice and rats to investigate pathogenesis of Bcc species. The rat chronic respiratory infection model described by Cash et al. (1979) involves transtracheal delivery of agar-embedded bacteria directly into the lung allowing for bacterial persistence and pathology to be measured. This chronic infection model has been used to identify Bcc species and bacterial strains that persisted or caused lung pathology from less virulent strains such as mutants in ornibactin biosynthesis, uptake and utilization, zinc metalloproteases, and genes encoding other enzymes, transcriptional regulators, and lipopolysaccharide (Sokol et al., 1999, 2000; Bernier et al., 2003, 2008; Corbett et al., 2003; Baldwin et al., 2004; Bernier and Sokol, 2005; Kooi et al., 2006; Loutet et al., 2006; Flannagan et al., 2007). These studies have revealed the importance of individual genes or systems to virulence but have not assessed bacterial gene expression during infection.

Transcriptional profiling using custom B. cenocepacia microarrays and RNA sequencing technology have enabled in vitro gene expression studies to be performed at a genome level. Transcriptional profiling has been used to examine gene expression in different environmental conditions such as those mimicking CF sputum or soil, or in response to antimicrobials (Drevinek et al., 2008; Yoder-Himes et al., 2009, 2010; Peeters et al., 2010; Bazzini et al., 2011; Coenye et al., 2011; Sass et al., 2011). In addition to further characterizing genes previously known to be important in virulence, these studies have also identified many genes with potential importance in virulence. Our current understanding of B. cenocepacia physiology, pathogenesis, and survival is incomplete since the B. cenocepacia genome, which is over 8 Mb, contains genes encoding many uncharacterized proteins. Identifying such proteins and determining their functional significance will improve our abilities to target such proteins for therapeutic purposes. To date, no studies have profiled B. cenocepacia gene expression at the whole genome level directly from infected cells/tissues or during infection of a susceptible host. To further understand B. cenocepacia adaptation to the host environment, we have used microarrays to examine the B. cenocepacia gene expression signature in the rat chronic respiratory infection model and compared this to high cell-density laboratory-grown cultures.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions for in vitro samples

Burkholderia cenocepacia K56-2 is a CF isolate that belongs to the ET12 lineage (RAPD type 2) and is clonally related to the sequenced strain J2315 (Mahenthiralingam et al., 2000; Baldwin et al., 2004; Holden et al., 2009). To generate in vitro samples, K56-2 cultures were grown at 37°C, in 10 ml Miller’s Luria broth (LB; Invitrogen, Burlington, ON, Canada) with shaking in 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks to stationary phase (16 h) as previously described (O’Grady et al., 2009). Bacterial growth was assessed by determining the optical density (OD) at 600 nm.

Animal studies

Animal infections were performed using the rat agar bead respiratory infection model (Cash et al., 1979). Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (150–180 g; Charles River, QC, Canada) were inoculated transtracheally with approximately 107 CFU of K56-2. At 3 days postinfection, infected lungs were aseptically removed, stored at 4°C overnight in 15 ml of RNA later (Ambion, Streetsville, ON, Canada), and subsequently maintained at −70°C to prevent RNA degradation. Animal experiments were conducted according to the guidelines of the Canadian Council of Animal Care for the care and use of experimental animals under protocol M08089 approved by the University of Calgary Animal Care Committee.

RNA manipulations

Total RNA from in vitro samples was prepared as previously described (O’Grady et al., 2009) using a RiboPure bacterial RNA isolation kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Ambion). For in vivo samples, total RNA from infected lungs was isolated using Tri Reagent (Invitrogen) as recommended by the manufacturer. Total RNA samples were enriched for bacterial RNA using a MicrobEnrich kit (Ambion) and purified using a MegaClear kit (Ambion). Enriched and purified bacterial RNA was depleted of 16S and 23S rRNAs using a MicrobExpress kit (Ambion) to isolate mRNA according to manufacturer’s instructions to provide enhanced sensitivity for microarray experiments. DNase treatment was performed on all RNA samples using DNA-Free (Ambion), and samples were confirmed by PCR using Taq polymerase (Invitrogen) to be free of DNA prior to cDNA synthesis.

Microarray analysis

In vitro-derived total RNA and in vivo-derived mRNA samples were indirectly labeled with the CyScribe Post-Labelling Kit (GE Healthcare) and cDNA synthesis performed as described by Sass et al. (2011) with the following modifications. Three independent RNA samples were used for in vitro samples and two mRNA samples (each consisting of an mRNA pool isolated from two infected rats to reduce variability between animals) were used for in vivo samples. Approximately 10 μg total RNA was labeled for each in vitro sample and 8 μg mRNA was labeled for each in vivo sample. The reference pool for microarray experiments consisted of B. cenocepacia J2315 genomic DNA isolated and labeled as described (Sass et al., 2011). The B. cenocepacia J2315 custom microarray, with each probe printed four times using the Agilent Sure Print 4 × 44 microarray platform, was used (Drevinek et al., 2008; Sass et al., 2011). Approximately 700–1000 ng labeled cDNA from the in vitro and in vivo samples and 55 ng labeled control genomic DNA was used per microarray. Hybridization, washing, and scanning were performed as described using the Two Color Microarray Based Gene Expression Analysis Protocol (Agilent) and the data analyzed using GeneSpring GX version 7.3.1. All labeling, hybridization, and scanning were performed by the Mahenthiralingam Laboratory, Cardiff University, Wales. Initial data were preprocessed by employing the enhanced Agilent FE import method. Probes specific to J2315 were filtered on a 1.5-fold change in expression between conditions to identify clusters of differentially regulated genes related to specific functions or potentially organized in operons. To eliminate potential differences in RNA between samples, data were normalized to control samples and mean log2 ratios (in vivo/in vitro) calculated from replicates were used and reported as expression ratios. Mean log2 ratios were also filtered on twofold changes in expression between in vivo and in vitro conditions to identify more stringently differentially regulated genes. The in vitro- or in vivo-derived K56-2 cDNA produced a signal that was detected by at least 94% of the probes on the microarray. Operon prediction and gene annotation or predicted protein function were retrieved from the B. cenocepacia J2315 genome at http://www.burkholderia.com (Winsor et al., 2008) or http://www.microbesonline.org (Dehal et al., 2009). The entire microarray data set has been deposited in the Array Express database http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress under accession number E-MEXP-3367.

Quantitative RT-PCR

RNA for quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was derived independently of that used for microarray analysis. Briefly, total RNA was isolated from three independent in vitro cultures prepared as described above. In a separate animal experiment to that used to prepare the microarray samples, enriched and purified total RNA was isolated as described above from three infected rats yielding three independent in vivo samples. Oligonucleotide primers (Table 1) were designed with Primer3 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 2000) and were synthesized by the University of Calgary Core DNA Services (Calgary, AB, Canada). BCAL0421 (gyrB) encoding DNA gyrase subunit B, previously used as a housekeeping gene in the Bcc multilocus sequence typing scheme (Baldwin et al., 2005) was used as a control as described previously (Peeters et al., 2010). Expression of gyrB was not significantly altered according to microarray analysis (data not shown). RT-PCR was performed using an iScript Select cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Quantification and melting curve analyses were performed with SsoFast Evagreen supermix with low ROX on an iCycler (Bio-Rad) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For each of the three in vitro and in vivo cDNA samples, qRT-PCRs were performed in triplicate, normalized to the control gene, gyrB. Data were calculated as previously described (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008) and represented as fold change of the in vivo samples relative to the in vitro samples.

Table 1.

Oligonucleotide primers used in this study for qRT-PCR.

Primer Sequence (5′–3′) Product size (bp) Reference
L0114fliCRTfor1 GCGTGTCGATGATTCAAACGGCAT 159 O’Grady et al. (2009)
L0114fliCRTrev1 TCACTTCCTGGATCTGCTGCGAAA
L0343hcpRTfor1 ACGTTCTCGCTGAAGTACGC 120 This study
L0343hcpRTrev1 CGCGTAGGTCTTGTCGTTCT
L1525qRTfor1 AGCAATCATCAAGCGTTTCC 87 This study
L1525qRTrev1 AGAGCGACTGCGATAAGTCC
M2194mmsAqRTfor1 ATGACGGTCTACACGCATGA 164 This study
M2194mmsAqRTrev1 TCGATCTCGCTCTGGAACTT
M2702prpCqRTfor1 GAAATCCAGAGCCGCTACAG 83 This study
M2702prpCqRTrev1 CCGATCACCACTTCCTTGTT
pBCA025traFqRTfor1 TCGACCTTTGCTGATACGTG 196 This study
pBCA025traFqRTrev1 GGCAGTAAGGGCAGTCAGAG
pBCA045traKqRTfor1 CGAGCCATCAAGAAGGTTGT 157 This study
pBCA045traKqRTrev1 ACTGGTAGGTAGCGCCTTGA
pBCA053qRTfor1 GCAAAGGCCGACACATCTAT 90 This study
pBCA053qRTrev1 TCTACGGGATACCGAACAGC
L0421gyrBqRTfor1 GTTCCACTGCATCGCGACTT 109 Peeters et al. (2010)
L0421gyrBqRTrev1 GGGCTTCGTCGAATTCATCA

Results

Genes on all genomic elements are induced in response to the host environment

Global gene expression profiles were generated using microarrays from B. cenocepacia cultures recovered from rat lungs 3 days postinfection using a chronic respiratory infection model and compared to those of B. cenocepacia cultures grown to high cell-density in vitro. Using a fold change cut off of ≥1.5, we identified 366 genes that were induced in vitro and 304 genes that were induced in vivo (Table 2). The B. cenocepacia J2315 genome is comprised of four genetic elements: chromosome 1, 3.87 Mb; chromosome 2, 3.22 Mb; chromosome 3, 0.88 Mb; and a plasmid, 0.09 Mb (Holden et al., 2009). Differential expression was observed for genes present on the three chromosomes as well as the plasmid. The number of genes induced in vitro or induced in vivo on each genomic element and the percentage of the total number of genes induced in vitro or in vivo located on each genomic element is shown in Table 2. For in vitro induced genes, the distribution of changes across the genome was relatively proportional to the size of each genomic element, i.e., a decreasing percentage of genes showed altered expression from chromosomes 1 through 3 and to the plasmid. Interestingly, more than 20% of genes induced in vivo were plasmid genes indicating this group of genes was highly overrepresented (Table 2). Consistent with this observation, for chromosomes 1 through 3, the percentage of genes on each replicon induced in vivo was similar and ranged from 2.9 to 4.8%, in marked contrast to the plasmid where 66% of plasmid-encoded genes were induced in vivo (Table 2).

Table 2.

Microarray analysis of B. cenocepacia genes induced in vitro or induced in vivo.

Genomic element
Total
Chr 1a Chr 2 Chr 3 Plasmid
Number of genes induced in vitro 182b 139 44 1 366
Number of genes induced in vivo 104 102 36 62 304
Percentage of total genes induced in vitro (%) 49.7c 38.0 12.0 0.3 100
Percentage of total genes induced in vivo (%) 34.2 33.6 11.8 20.4 100
Percentage of genes on each replicon induced in vitro (%) 5.1c 4.9 6.0 1.1 5.1d
Percentage of genes on each replicon induced in vivo (%) 2.9 3.6 4.8 66.0 4.2

aChr, chromosomes 1, 2, or 3 of B. cenocepacia J2315.

bNumber or cpercentage of B. cenocepacia genes or dpercentage of a total of 7210 B. cenocepacia genes exhibiting changes (≥1.5-fold) in expression in RNA recovered from rat lungs (in vivo) relative to RNA isolated from in vitro grown cultures as determined by microarray analysis.

A majority of characterized virulence genes are similarly expressed between in vitro and in vivo environments

At least 28 genes have been characterized in B. cenocepacia that are known to be important for virulence and belong to functional groups including stress resistance, extracellular enzymes or secreted toxins, QS, transcriptional regulation, as well as genes involved in heme uptake, iron acquisition, and the synthesis of structural components such as lipopolysaccharide, porins, and lectins (Loutet and Valvano, 2010). Analysis of these virulence genes showed that expression of the majority of these genes was similar between in vitro and in vivo conditions (Figure 1). The expression of cepI, encoding an N-acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) synthase, was somewhat lower in vivo and this observation was consistent with lower expression of CepIR-regulated genes including those encoding extracellular zinc metalloproteases ZmpA and ZmpB, the orphan LuxR homolog CepR2 and the LysR-type transcriptional regulator ShvR (Figure 1). Two other genes known to be influenced by CepIR such as the major catalase/peroxidase encoded by katB and an acyl-CoA dehydrogenase encoded by BCAS0208 were similarly expressed in the in vitro and in vivo environments (Figure 1). The BCAS0208 mutant caused less lung pathology than wild type in the rat chronic respiratory infection model (Subramoni et al., 2011).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

In vivo expression of characterized virulence genes. Expression ratio of RNA recovered from rat lungs (in vivo) relative to RNA isolated from in vitro grown cultures as determined by microarray analysis. The “BCA” designation has been removed from names of genes encoded on chromosomes 1, 2, and 3 for image clarity.

Limited iron availability in mammals is circumvented by infectious pathogens by the production of iron binding and transport complexes such as heme binding proteins and siderophores. Although genes involved in heme transport (huvA and hmuS) were not differentially expressed between in vivo and in vitro environments (Figure 1), huvA mutants exhibited survival defects in the rat chronic respiratory infection model (Hunt et al., 2004). Genes involved in ornibactin biosynthesis and transport were also expressed at similar levels in both environments, although ornibactin mediated iron uptake is required for persistence in the rat chronic respiratory infection model (Visser et al., 2004). Among the characterized virulence genes, the lowest in vivo expression ratio (0.04) was observed for BCAS0293 (aidA; Figure 1). The aidA gene encodes a protein that significantly contributes to virulence against C. elegans (Huber et al., 2004), but an aidA mutation had no effect on virulence in the rat chronic respiratory infection model (Uehlinger et al., 2009).

Secretion systems are selectively regulated between in vitro and in vivo environments

Burkholderia cenocepacia has one type II, type III, and type VI protein secretion systems (T2SS, T3SS, and T6SS, respectively) that contribute to pathogenesis, and two type IV secretion systems (T4SS), one of which has been shown to be important in virulence. Expression of genes encoding components of each of these systems varied between in vitro and in vivo environments.

The T2SS is composed at least 12 ORFs on three gsp operons and is involved in secretion of extracellular zinc metalloproteases ZmpA, ZmpB, and other extracellular proteins that have enzymatic activity such as phospholipase C, hemolysin, lipase, and polygalacturonase (Fehlner-Gardiner et al., 2002; Kothe et al., 2003; Gingues et al., 2005; Somvanshi et al., 2010). Expression of the three gsp operons encoding the T2SS was similar between in vitro and in vivo conditions (Figure 2A). Apart from the lower expression of zmpA and zmpB in vivo (Figure 1), expression of other genes encoding enzymes secreted by the T2SS described above was not different between in vitro and in vivo conditions (data not shown). The B. cenocepacia T3SS genes are organized in two operons on chromosome 2 thought to be responsible for secretion of effector proteins that have yet to be identified (Tomich et al., 2003; Glendinning et al., 2004). Mutation of bcscN, encoding an ATP-binding protein, reduced bacterial survival, and lung inflammation in a mouse agar bead infection model (Tomich et al., 2003). In our study, the mean expression ratio of genes in the bcscQ and bcscV operons was 1.03 and 0.99, respectively, in the in vivo compared to in vitro conditions (Figure 2B) indicating that there was no difference in expression.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

In vivo expression of genes encoding secretion systems. Expression ratio of RNA recovered from rat lungs (in vivo) relative to RNA isolated from in vitro grown cultures as determined by microarray analysis. (A) T2SS, (B) T3SS, (C) T4SS, (D) T6SS. Inset in (C) is chromosome 2-encoded T4SS genes with expanded y-axis. The “BCA” designation has been removed from names of genes encoded on chromosomes 1, 2, and 3 for image clarity. Putative operons are indicated by arrows.

Two gene clusters located on chromosome 2 and the plasmid have been identified to encode components of T4SS. Interestingly, the plasmid-encoded T4SS was induced in vivo. The bc-VirB/D4 T4SS on chromosome 2 shares homology with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens T4SS and is involved in plasmid mobilization (Engledow et al., 2004). The second T4SS gene cluster exists on a 92.7-kb plasmid that is found in relatively few B. cenocepacia strains including J2315 and K56-2 (Engledow et al., 2004) but not AU1054 or MCO-3 (Winsor et al., 2008). This plasmid-encoded T4SS contributes to the plant tissue watersoaking (ptw) phenotype and disease symptoms in onion tissue (Engledow et al., 2004) and increased survival of B. cenocepacia in macrophages and airway epithelial cells (Sajjan et al., 2008). Expression of genes on the chromosome 2-encoded T4SS were similar in the in vitro and in vivo conditions (Figure 2C). In contrast, several genes that are part of the plasmid-encoded T4SS were markedly induced in vivo at levels ranging from 3- to 46.1-fold (Figure 2C). Higher in vivo expression of pBCA025 encoding the putative conjugative transfer protein TraF and pBCA045 encoding the putative exported protein TraK was confirmed using qRT-PCR (Table 3). These data indicated differential regulation of chromosome 2- and plasmid-encoded T4SS between in vitro and in vivo conditions.

Table 3.

Microarray and qRT-PCR analysis of selected genes showing differential expression from in vivo compared to in vitro grown cultures.

Gene Annotation or predicted functiona Fold changeb
microarray qRT-PCR
BCAL0114 fliC, type II flagellin protein −8.29 −28.00
BCAL0343 Hcp, hemolysin-coregulated protein −1.86 −7.82
BCAL1525 Flp type pilus subunit −11.75 −12.95
BCAM2194 mmsA, methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase 2.26 1.74
BCAM2702 prpC, 2-methylcitrate synthase 5.88 8.29
pBCA025 traF, putative conjugative transfer protein 7.10 344.86
pBCA045 traK, putative exported protein 12.43 33.26
pBCA053 Putative extracellular solute-binding protein 480.70 10.44

aDerived from B. cenocepacia J2315 (Holden et al., 2009) at http://www.burkholderia.com (Winsor et al., 2008) or http://www.microbesonline.org (Dehal et al., 2009).

bFold change of RNA recovered from rat lungs (in vivo) relative to RNA isolated from in vitro grown cultures as determined by microarray or qRT-PCR analysis.

The B. cenocepacia T6SS comprises 16 genes organized in three adjacent operons on chromosome 1. The T6SS contributes to survival of B. cenocepacia in the rat chronic respiratory infection model (Hunt et al., 2004) and influences infection of macrophages (Aubert et al., 2008). Expression of BCAL0339 and BCAL0346 was lower in B. cenocepacia growing in medium supplemented with CF sputum compared to control cultures (Drevinek et al., 2008). In our study, expression of six T6SS genes was lower in vivo compared to in vitro conditions. The BCAL0340–0348 operon exhibited the lowest expression in vivo (0.66) compared to the other two T6SS operons (Figure 2D). The BCAL0340 operon includes genes encoding the ClpV-like chaperone (BCAL0347) and the hemolysin-coregulated protein (Hcp) (BCAL0343; Aubert et al., 2008). The ClpV-like chaperone is required for secretion of Hcp in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Mougous et al., 2006). The hcp gene showed the lowest in vivo expression (0.54) of any T6SS gene and the low hcp expression in vivo was confirmed using qRT-PCR (Figure 2D; Table 3).

Motility and Flp type pilus-encoding genes are induced in vitro

Bacterial motility, attachment, and invasion via flagellar- and pilus-encoding genes are known to be important in virulence (Tomich et al., 2002; Urban et al., 2004). Expression of 24 flagellar-associated genes from eight different operons distributed across chromosome 1 was lower in vivo, with the lowest in vivo/in vitro expression ratio (0.23) observed for fliC, encoding type II flagellin (Figure 3A). Lower expresssion of fliC in vivo compared to in vitro conditions was independently confirmed using qRT-PCR (Table 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

In vivo expression of motility and pilus genes. Expression ratio of RNA recovered from rat lungs (in vivo) relative to RNA isolated from in vitro grown cultures as determined by microarray analysis. (A) Flagellar-associated genes, (B) Flp type pilus genes. The “BCA” designation has been removed from names of genes encoded on chromosomes 1, 2, and 3 for image clarity. Putative operons are indicated by arrows.

The genomic locus from BCAL1520–1537 encodes components of a subclass of type IVb prepilins, called a Flp type pilus, that is similar to the flp–tad–rcp locus that is involved in adherence and biofilm formation in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (Kachlany et al., 2001; Inoue et al., 2003) and aggregation and biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa (de Bentzmann et al., 2006). Ten genes encoding components of the chromosome 1-encoded Flp type pilus had lower in vivo expression. The lowest expression was observed for BCAL1525 encoding a Flp type pilus subunit and this trend was confirmed using qRT-PCR (Figure 3B; Table 3).

Identification of genes potentially important in the host environment

Approximately 300 genes were identified with at least a 1.5-fold change increase in expression in vivo compared to in vitro grown cultures (Table A1 in Appendix). Selected genes and their fold change differences are shown in Table 4. Many of these genes have not been previously characterized in B. cenocepacia. The most common putative functions of these in vivo induced genes were related to adaptation to stress or a host environment, metabolism, or nutrient acquisition (Table 4).

Table 4.

Selected genes induced during chronic lung infection.

Gene Annotation or predicted functiona Fold changeb
OSMOTIC STRESS AND ADAPTATION
BCAL1103 Putative OsmB-like lipoprotein 2.1
BCAL2044 LdcA LD-carboxypeptidase A 1.5
BCAL2558 Pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase 2.1
BCAL3297 DPS-family DNA-binding ferritin like protein 1.7
BCAL3310 YceI family protein, osmotic, and acid stress adaptation 1.7
BCAL3311 YceI family protein, osmotic, and acid stress adaptation 1.6
BCAL3314 PqiA paraquat inducible protein A 2.4
BCAL3362 Putative oxidoreductase 1.8
BCAM0027 PadR family regulatory protein, phenolic acid induced stress response 1.5
BCAM0414 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.0
BCAM0415 Putative betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase 1.5
BCAM2700 prpF, putative membrane protein 1.8
BCAM2701 acnA, aconitate hydratase 1 2.7
BCAM2702 prpC, 2-methylcitrate synthase 5.9
BCAM2703 prpB, probable methylisocitrate lyase 2.8
METAL ION TRANSPORT OR METABOLISM
BCAL0269 Oxidoreductase, molybdopterin-binding domain 1.6
BCAL0366 Nitroreductase family protein, metal ion oxidation 1.6
BCAL0580 Putative chromate transport protein 1.6
BCAL1789 ExbB, iron-transport protein 1.7
BCAL2485 Putative iron–sulfur cluster-binding electron 2.1
BCAL2486 Putative iron–sulfur oxidoreductase 2.1
BCAM0447 Putative exported multicopper oxidase 13.0
BCAM1187 TonB-dependent siderophore receptor 1.7
BCAM1527 Putative cation efflux protein 1.8
BCAM2007 TonB-dependent siderophore receptor 1.6
BCAS0028 Succinylglutamate desuccinylase/aspartoacylase 2.8
BCAS0449 Nickle ion binding-protein-dependent transport 1.6
CARBOHYDRATE TRANSPORT AND METABOLISM
BCAL0804 N-acetylglucosamine transferase 1.5
BCAL1657 Putative ribose transport system 1.8
BCAL1658 Putative ribose ABC transporter ATP-binding 1.5
BCAL1754 Major facilitator superfamily protein, carbohydrate transport 3.5
BCAL2040 Polysaccharide deacetylase, carbohydrate transport 1.5
BCAL3038 ABC transporter ATP-binding component, carbohydrate ABC transporter 1.6
BCAL3039 ABC transporter, membrane permease 1.5
BCAL3040 ABC transporter, membrane permease 1.7
BCAL3041 MalE, maltose-binding protein 2.1
BCAL3364 Putative gluconokinase 1.7
BCAM0094 Xylulose kinase 1.7
BCAM1330 Cellulose polysaccharide export protein 1.7
BCAM1333 Cellulose exopolysaccharide acyltransferase 1.6
BCAM1390 Putative aldolase 3.0
BCAM2260 Major facilitator superfamily protein 1.6
BCAS0230 Putative sugar ABC transporter ATP-binding 1.6
AMINO ACID TRANSPORT AND METABOLISM
BCAL0446 Putative aminotransferase 2.9
BCAL1212 bkdA1, 2-oxoisovalerate dehydrogenase alpha subunit 3.0
BCAL1213 bkdA2, 2-oxoisovalerate dehydrogenase beta subunit 2.9
BCAL1214 bhdB, lipoamide acyltransferase 3.7
BCAL1215 lpdV, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase 2.2
BCAL1749 Putative CoA-transferase 2.4
BCAL1750 Conserved hypothetical protein, pyruvate decarboxylase 2.4
BCAL1751 Glyoxalase/bleomycin resistance, amino acid transport 1.7
BCAM0047 Lysine exporter – LysE/YggA 2.6
BCAM0178 ABC transporter periplasmic solute-binding protein 2.7
BCAM0368 Putative branched-chain amino acid transport 1.5
BCAM0459 Cysteine desulfurase 3.6
BCAM0983 leuC1, 3-isopropylmalate dehydratase large subunit 2.9
BCAM0983A Putative entericidin B-like bacteriolytic toxin 2.0
BCAM0984 leuD1, 3-isopropylmalate dehydratase small subunit 2.1
BCAM1150 3-Hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase 1.6
BCAM1151 Methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase 2.4
BCAM1427 LysE family transporter 3.7
BCAM1487 Putative ABC transporter, substrate-binding 3.1
BCAM1488 Putative proline racemase 1.9
BCAM2095 Putative HTH transcriptional regulator 1.6
BCAM2096 puuB gamma-glutamylputrescine oxidoreductase 1.9
BCAM2191 Enoyl-CoA hydratase/isomerase family 1.9
BCAM2192 Enoyl-CoA hydratase/isomerase family protein 2.4
BCAM2193 mmsB, 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase 2.4
BCAM2194 mmsA, methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase 2.3
BCAM2195 Putative AMP-binding enzyme 2.5
BCAM2196 Putative acyl-CoA dehydrogenase 2.1
BCAM2237 Putative 2,2-dialkylglycine decarboxylase 2.4
BCAS0397 Metallo peptidase, subfamily M20D 2.0
BCAS0443 Putative binding-protein-dependent transport 5.3
BCAS0574 Amino acid ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 3.7
BCAS0575 Putative binding-protein-dependent transport 2.0
BCAS0577 Periplasmic solute-binding protein 1.5
MEMBRANE PROTEINS
BCAL0403 Putative outer membrane-bound lytic murein 1.5
BCAL0624 Putative OmpC, outer membrane porin protein precursor 1.6
BCAL1678 Putative outer membrane usher protein precursor, fimD pilin biogenesis 2.4
BCAL2083 YaeT, Outer membrane protein assembly factor 1.5
BCAL2191 Putative 17 kDa membrane protein surface antigen 3.1
BCAL2468 Putative membrane protein 1.9
BCAL2482 Putative OmpC outer membrane protein 3.1
BCAL2505 Putative membrane protein 1.5
BCAL2552 Putative membrane protein 1.5
BCAL2553 Putative membrane protein 1.8
BCAL3033 Probable outer membrane lipoprotein carrier 1.5
BCAL3203 Putative periplasmic TolB protein 1.6
BCAL3204 Putative OmpA family lipoprotein/PAL 1.7
BCAL3205 YbgF,Tol-PAL system protein 1.6
BCAL3473 Putative OmpC-like outer membrane porin 1.9
BCAM0926 Multidrug efflux system transporter protein 5.9
BCAM1207 ABC transporter ATP-binding membrane protein 1.5
BCAM1341 Acyltransferase like protein 3.2
BCAM1425 Putative membrane protein 2.9
BCAM1563 ABC transporter ATP-binding membrane protein 1.7
BCAM1946 Putative quinoxaline efflux system transporter 1.6
BCAM1957 ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 1.6
BCAM2647 Putative membrane protein 1.7
BCAM2648 NAD dependent epimerase/dehydratase family, outer membrane biogenesis 1.6
BCAS0308 Putative flp type pilus assembly protein, TadG-like pilus 2.4
BCAS0463 Putative membrane protein 1.6
pBCA010 Putative membrane protein 3.2
pBCA014 Putative membrane protein 3.3
pBCA019 Putative membrane protein 2.4
pBCA026 Putative membrane protein 10.6
pBCA029 Putative membrane protein 8.6
pBCA034 Putative membrane protein 6.0
pBCA036 Putative membrane protein 13.8
pBCA037 Putative membrane protein 7.3
pBCA048 Putative membrane protein 55.6
EXPORTED PROTEINS
BCAL0305 Putative exported protein 2.2
BCAL0623 Putative exported protein 1.7
BCAL1279 Putative exported protein 1.6
BCAL1499 Putative exported protein 1.8
BCAL1539 Putative exported protein 2.3
BCAL1798 Putative exported protein 1.9
BCAL1961 Putative exported protein 1.9
BCAL2187 Putative exported protein 1.6
BCAL2607 Putative exported protein 2.7
BCAL2615 Putative exported outer membrane porin protein 2.2
BCAL2911 Proline-rich exported protein 1.6
BCAL2956 Putative exported protein 1.5
BCAL3024 Putative exported protein 1.6
BCAL3490 Putative exported protein 2.0
BCAL3492 Putative exported protein 1.6
BCAM0676 Putative exported protein 1.8
BCAM1726 Putative exported protein 2.0
BCAM1742 Putative exported protein 1.9
BCAM1964 Putative exported protein 1.6
BCAM2073 Putative exported protein 3.0
pBCA013 Putative exported protein 6.3
REGULATORY PROTEINS
BCAL2488 LysR family regulatory protein 2.0
BCAL2529 LysR family regulatory protein 1.5
BCAL3486 ecfM, RNA polymerase sigma factor, sigma-70 1.8
BCAM0422 LuxR superfamily regulatory protein 1.9
BCAM0595 LysR family regulatory protein 2.6
BCAM2025 Sigma-54 interacting regulatory protein 1.9
BCAM2162 MarR family regulatory protein 2.0
BCAS0436 AraC family regulatory protein 1.7
pBCA035 GntR family regulatory protein 18.9

aDerived from B. cenocepacia J2315 (Holden et al., 2009) at http://www.burkholderia.com (Winsor et al., 2008) or http://www.microbesonline.org (Dehal et al., 2009).

bFold change of RNA recovered from rat lungs (in vivo) relative to RNA isolated from in vitro grown cultures as determined by microarray analysis.

Novel genes induced in vivo

A four gene operon (BCAM2703–2700) containing genes involved in the methylcitrate cycle, required for propionyl-CoA metabolism, and fatty-acid utilization, were markedly induced in vivo (Table 4). Induced in vivo expression of BCAM2702 (prpC) encoding 2-methylcitrate synthase was confirmed using qRT-PCR (Table 3). Genes involved in the methylcitrate and glyoxylate cycles are required for virulence in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which relies more on fatty acids than carbohydrates during infection (Munoz-Elias and McKinney, 2005). Genes involved in the methylcitrate cycle are upregulated in M. tuberculosis isolated from murine macrophages (Schnappinger et al., 2003) and are important for growth in macrophages but not for intracellular survival (Munoz-Elias et al., 2006). It is unknown whether the methylcitrate cycle plays a role in B. cenocepacia intracellular survival in macrophages. An uncharacterized seven gene operon (BCAM2196–BCAM2191) containing genes putatively involved in lipid metabolism was also induced in vivo (Table 4), suggesting that fatty-acid metabolism or utilization may be important in B. cenocepacia lung infections. Using qRT-PCR we confirmed expression of BCAM2194 (mmsA) encoding methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase was induced in vivo (Table 3). A four gene operon (BCAL1212–1215) induced in vivo encodes genes for a 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complex (Table 4). The dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase gene component of a similar complex was shown to be important for persistence and virulence in Streptococcus pneumoniae infection models likely due to having a role in capsule synthesis rather than metabolism of 2-oxo acids (Smith et al., 2002).

BCAM0415 encodes a betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH; Table 4). In P. aeruginosa, BADH has been shown to be induced by choline and choline precursors (Velasco-Garcia et al., 2006a) which are abundant in infected lung tissues (Wright and Clements, 1987). In addition to playing a role in assimilating carbon and nitrogen from choline, BADH produces glycine betaine which can protect bacteria from high osmolarity stress and oxidative stress in infected tissues. BADH has been proposed as a therapeutic target for P. aeruginosa since inactivation of this enzyme leads to intracellular accumulation of betaine aldehyde, which is toxic, and the inability to grow in medium with choline (Velasco-Garcia et al., 2006b; Zaldivar-Machorro et al., 2011). Homologs of other genes induced by osmotic stress in bacteria were also identified as being induced in vivo (Table 4). BCAL1103, encodes an OsmB-like protein. OsmB is induced by osmotic stress and stationary phase growth conditions in E. coli (Jung et al., 1990; Boulanger et al., 2005). BCAL3310 and BCAL3311 are predicted to be co-transcribed YceI family proteins, homologs of which have been shown to be induced in response to osmotic stress in E. coli (Weber et al., 2006) and acid stress in Helicobacter pylori (Sisinni et al., 2010). BCAL2558, a putative pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase with some similarity to TrxB (thioredoxin reductase) homologs, was induced twofold in vivo. TrxB genes are involved in cellular redox processes and defense against oxidative stress and are important in intracellular survival in some pathogens (Bjur et al., 2006; Potter et al., 2009). BCAL3314 encodes a homolog of PqiA-like proteins, which are induced by paraquat and other superoxide generators in E. coli (Koh and Roe, 1995). BCAL3297 encodes a DPS-family DNA-binding ferritin. Homologs of these proteins are involved in resistance as well as iron sequestration (Calhoun and Kwon, 2011).

Although many of the in vivo induced outer membrane protein encoding genes are uncharacterized, a few have homology to proteins with predicted functions. BCAL3203, L3204, and L3205 form part of the Tol-PAL system membrane complex that is required for membrane integrity and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several Gram-negative bacteria (Bowe et al., 1998; Godlewska et al., 2009; Paterson et al., 2009). TolB (BCAL3203) is a periplasmic protein involved in biopolymer transport. BCAL3205 is a YbgF homolog which is the last gene of the Tol-PAL complex and interacts with TolA (Krachler et al., 2010). BCAL3204 has been annotated as OmpA/PAL. PAL has been shown to contribute to virulence in several Gram-negative bacteria and in E. coli has been shown to be released into the bloodstream contributing to septic shock (Hellman et al., 2002; Liang et al., 2005). A 17 kDa OmpA-like protein has recently been shown to be an immunodominant antigen following intranasal immunization with a B. cenocepacia outer membrane protein preparation in mice (Makidon et al., 2010). Although the immunoreactive protein reported to be an OmpA-like protein was not conclusively identified, the partial amino acid sequence determined from a peptide of this molecular mass isolated from SDS-polyacrylamide gels, has 95.8% identity to BCAL3204. There are at least six other OmpA-like proteins in B. cenocepacia with varying degrees of sequence identify; however, PAL has been shown to highly immunogenic in other bacteria (Godlewska et al., 2009). Therefore it is possible that the immunodominant antigen identified by Makidon et al. (2010) is PAL. BCAL2191, which was increased threefold in vivo (Table 4) is predicted to be an outer membrane lipoprotein with similarity to 17 kDa surface antigens in other species and therefore it is also possible that this protein contributed to the observed reaction with antiserum on Western blots in the study by Makidon et al. (2010). Several other proteins involved in biogenesis of membrane and other cell surface components were also identified (Table 4) including BCAL2083, a YaeT homolog, which in E. coli is an essential gene required for outer membrane assembly (Werner and Misra, 2005). BCAL2482 is a putative outer membrane porin (OmpC) and is in the same predicted operon as BCAL2486 and BCAL2485, which are iron–sulfur oxidoreductase and iron–sulfur electron transport proteins, respectively. All three genes are induced at least twofold in vivo (Table 4).

Although ornibactin biosynthesis and uptake genes were expressed at similar levels in the in vitro and in vivo conditions used in this study, a number of other genes potentially involved in metal ion transport and metabolism were identified as being induced in vivo (Table 4). These included exbB, genes coding for iron–sulfur proteins and receptors for unknown siderophores. One of the most highly induced genes in vivo was BCAM0447 which encodes a putative multicopper oxidase (MCO). MCO genes are found in a number of genomes but have only recently been characterized. The MCO protein of P. aeruginosa has been shown to be involved in the oxidation of ferrous to ferric iron and may be important in iron acquisition (Huston et al., 2002). MCO homologs are also involved in copper resistance and dissemination in mice in S. typhimurium (Achard et al., 2010) and copper tolerance in Campylobacter jejuni (Hall et al., 2008).

Genes encoding proteins of unknown function induced in vivo are shown in Table 4 and Table A1 in Appendix. Many of the expressed genes encode outer membrane proteins (11) and exported proteins (24) that could contribute to cell surface alterations or virulence. Genes encoding six hypothetical proteins were unique to B. cenocepacia (Table A1 in Appendix), whereas, 23 genes encoding hypothetical proteins were conserved in one or more members of the Bcc, of which 11 were also conserved in Burkholderia pseudomallei (Table A1 in Appendix). It is possible that these proteins are involved in adaptation, survival, or virulence in lung infections although further studies are required to determine their potential importance.

Plasmid-associated genes

Interestingly, the most highly induced genes in vivo were located on the plasmid where the vast majority of the genes were expressed at much higher levels in vivo than in vitro (Figure 4). Of the plasmid genes annotated in the J2315 sequence (Winsor et al., 2008), 62 genes had higher expression in the lung infection model. Only one gene, pBCA055, had higher expression levels in vitro, and the following genes had similar expression: pBCA003–007, 061, 063, 064, 066–075, 078–081, 083–086, 091–094.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

In vivo expression of plasmid-encoded genes. Expression ratio of RNA recovered from rat lungs (in vivo) relative to RNA isolated from in vitro grown cultures as determined by microarray analysis. The “pBCA” designation has been removed from names of plasmid-encoded genes for image clarity. Putative operons are indicated by arrows.

Many of the highly induced genes are part of the plasmid-encoded T4SS, which has been shown to play a role in both plant pathogenesis and survival in eukaryotic cells (Engledow et al., 2004; Sajjan et al., 2008). Expression ratios of genes known or predicted to be a part of the T4SS are shown in Figure 2C and described above. The presence of the plasmid-encoded T4SS in the B. cenocepacia ET12 lineage strains J2315 and K56-2 but not AU1054 or MCO-3 that entirely lack a plasmid is an interesting characteristic. Gene expression of pBCA054 encoding a LuxR family regulatory protein was higher in vivo. Interestingly, the most closely related pBCA054 orthologs are found in B. pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei, rather than in other members of the Bcc. pBCA001–002 are parAB-like homologs that are putatively involved in chromosome partitioning. pBCA017 is similar to the zeta toxin family of toxin–antitoxin complexes which are involved in programmed cell death to prevent proliferation of plasmid free cells (Gerdes et al., 2005). In addition to plasmid maintenance, toxin–antitoxin pairs can also be involved in responding to nutrient stress. Zeta toxins have recently been shown to target peptidoglycan synthesis triggering autolysis (Mutschler et al., 2011). Zeta toxins are typically paired with epsilon antitoxins; however, there does not appear to be an epsilon homolog adjacent to pBCA017. In some cases, a chromosomal antitoxin can neutralize the plasmid toxin, but in this case toxin expression would not favor plasmid maintenance (Van Melderen and Saavedra De Bast, 2009). Alternatively the toxin can be integrated into other regulatory networks or serve to reduce the overall population to increase nutrient availability for the survivors. Three genes forming an operon (pBCA053–051) exhibited the highest induction of any group of genes in vivo (Figure 4). pBCA053 encodes a extracellular solute-binding protein involved in dicarboxylate transporter carbohydrate metabolism and we confirmed higher in vivo expression of this gene using qRT-PCR (Table 3). The second and third genes in the operon encode an exported protein and a protein with homology to LamB/YcsF family proteins, respectively. In addition to the hypothetical proteins noted above, four putative exported proteins, nine putative membrane proteins, 12 conserved hypothetical proteins and 10 hypothetical proteins encoded on the plasmid were induced in vivo (Table A1 in Appendix). Few genes on this plasmid have been studied in detail opening the possibility for identifying proteins with potentially novel functions.

Discussion

In this study, we have identified the gene expression signature of B. cenocepacia during lung infections. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to apply transcriptomics for any member of the Bcc to study gene expression during infection of a susceptible host. Differential gene expression was observed for characterized virulence genes as well as potential novel virulence genes between in vitro and in vivo environments.

Altered in vivo gene expression was observed for genes encoding enzymes, regulators, structural appendages as well as those contributing to ornibactin biosynthesis, and quorum sensing systems. Lower in vivo expression was observed for AHL-dependent QS controlled genes that are directly (e.g., aidA) and indirectly (e.g., shvR) regulated at the transcriptional level by CepR (Weingart et al., 2005; O’Grady et al., 2011). These observations suggest that more favorable conditions exist for CepIR-dependent regulation of selected genes in high cell-density (∼109) laboratory-grown cultures compared to the lower cell-density (∼105) in the lung infections, although it is possible that higher expression of QS regulated genes occurs in selected locations in the lungs where bacteria are present in high cell-density biofilms. Since cepI and CepR-regulated genes including zmpA, zmpB, and shvR have been shown to be important for virulence in the rat chronic respiratory infection model (Corbett et al., 2003; Sokol et al., 2003; Kooi et al., 2006; Bernier et al., 2008), it is clear that these genes are expressed at sufficient levels to play a role in infection. The majority of characterized virulence genes were similarly expressed in the in vivo and in vivo conditions. This suggests that expression of these genes is just as important in high cell-density cultures and during lung infections. The contribution of these individual genes has been characterized in one or more infection models highlighting their importance in B. cenocepacia pathogenesis. Similar expression of characterized virulence genes during growth in vivo in hamsters and in vitro has previously been observed for B. pseudomallei (Tuanyok et al., 2006).

Increased expression of some genes belonging to the T3SS was observed in the closely related pathogens B. mallei and B. pseudomallei during infection of mice and hamsters, respectively (Kim et al., 2005; Tuanyok et al., 2006). In the present study, expression of T2SS and T3SS genes was similar between in vitro and in vivo environments. Genes in these secretion systems appear to be expressed at moderate levels in both in vitro and in vivo environments. We previously showed expression of the T2SS genes gspC and gspG was influenced by growth medium composition (O’Grady et al., 2011). A previous study was not able to identify growth conditions that altered expression of T3SS genes suggesting these genes are constitutively expressed (Engledow et al., 2004). The in vivo growth conditions provided a stimulus for expression of genes in the plasmid-encoded T4SS but did not affect expression of the T4SS genes on chromosome 2. A mutation in the chromosome 2-encoded T4SS was shown not to contribute to bacterial persistence or histopathology in the rat chronic respiratory infection model (Bernier and Sokol, 2005). To date, no studies have observed such a dramatic increase in expression of plasmid-encoded T4SS genes suggesting that specific environmental signal(s) in the lung environment enabled increased expression of these genes to be detected. It was shown that the plasmid-encoded T4SS contributed to onion tissue maceration through secretion of one or more effectors (Engledow et al., 2004). Whether this plasmid-encoded T4SS or its effectors have a role in mammalian cell/tissue damage has yet to be determined. We observed some T6SS genes had lower in vivo expression, in particular those genes on the BCAL0340 operon that includes a gene encoding the secreted effector Hcp. Previous work identified a transposon insertion in each of the three operons of the T6SS locus affected survival of B. cenocepacia in the rat chronic respiratory infection model (Hunt et al., 2004).

Using a mouse agar bead infection model, a flagellin mutant failed to cause mortality compared to wild type (Urban et al., 2004). It was also shown that motility mutants were less able to invade epithelial cells (Tomich et al., 2002). Recent work showed expression of flagellar- and chemotaxis-associated genes and motility was reduced in B. cenocepacia strains of the ET12 lineage that were isolated from CF patients (Sass et al., 2011). However, a previous study showed transcription of flagellar-associated genes was increased in B. cenocepacia J2315 cultured in medium supplemented with CF sputum (Drevinek et al., 2008). Conflicting data regarding expression of flagellar-associated genes in these two studies likely reflect the experimental conditions employed where increased expression of flagellar-associated genes was detected in rapidly growing cultures (Drevinek et al., 2008). The phenotypic characteristics of the B. cenocepacia non-motile CF isolates are similar to P. aeruginosa clinical isolates which often acquire loss-of-function mutations associated with motility during chronic lung infection (Mahenthiralingam et al., 1994). It has also been shown that P. aeruginosa exhibited decreased transcription of flagellar-associated genes when cultured in CF sputum (Wolfgang et al., 2004). In our study, we detected lower in vivo expression of genes involved in motility and Flp type pilus formation. This result was likely due to differences in culture conditions between in vitro and in vivo environments. The agar bead infection model bypasses the colonization step during infection (Cash et al., 1979). Our data suggest expression of these genes is not required in an established infection taking place in the lower respiratory tract. Therefore, decreased expression of these genes was expected since expression of these genes is an energy-expensive process and is more likely associated with rapidly growing cultures than cultures recovered from chronic lung infection.

We identified numerous genes that were induced during lung infections. Many of these genes encode proteins with functions related to metabolism, physiology, or adaptation to a stressful environment. While homologs of some of these proteins have been studied in other pathogens, these proteins have not been specifically studied in B. cenocepacia. Several B. cenocepacia ET12 lineage strains contain at least a 45-kb fragment of the plasmid found in K56-2 and J2315 (Engledow et al., 2004) while strains AU1054 and MCO-3 lack a plasmid (Winsor et al., 2008). While plasmid-minus derivatives of B. cenocepacia J2315 or K56-2 have not been reported, it would be interesting to determine what influence absence of the plasmid may have on infection considering the vast majority of plasmid-encoded genes were induced in vivo. Further confirmatory experiments are required to substantiate trends for additional genes that exhibited altered expression in the in vivo environmental conditions. Revealing the changes in gene expression that occur in bacterial cells during infection is a first step in understanding the response of bacterial cells to the host environment. Increased expression of genes during infection suggests these genes promote bacterial survival and adaptation in the lungs and potentially influence virulence. The identification of potential novel virulence genes among these in vivo induced genes provides an opportunity to characterize these genes in more detail in future studies. Determining what growth conditions alter the expression of these genes and how they are regulated in B. cenocepacia will shed light on their expression pattern. Increased expression of genes during lung infection could be due to a change in environmental cues that enable transcriptional activation by a positive regulator(s) or derepression by a negative regulator(s). For potentially novel virulence genes, it will be important to construct mutations and examine their influence on virulence-related phenotypes and pathogenesis in one or more infection models. This study provides an insight into B. cenocepacia gene expression in vivo and may provide opportunities to devise strategies to reduce or control B. cenocepacia lung infections.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

These studies were supported by research grants from Cystic Fibrosis Canada, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics (CFFT) (grant SOKOL06V0), and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant MOP-42510) to PAS. EPO was the recipient of a Cystic Fibrosis Canada fellowship. We thank S. A. McKeon and D. F. Viteri for performing the animal experiments and D. T. Nguyen for excellent technical assistance. Microarray processing and initial data assessment was provided by the Mahenthiralingam Laboratory, Cardiff University, with support from CFFT.

Appendix

Table A1.

Burkholderia cenocepacia genes induced during chronic lung infection.

Gene Annotation or predicted functiona Fold changeb
BCAL0123 Putative glycosyltransferase 2.17
BCAL0194 Putative oxidoreductase 1.62
BCAL0206A Putative outer membrane protein 2.36
BCAL0226 DNA-directed RNA polymerase beta chain 1.73
BCAL0227 DNA-directed RNA polymerase beta’ chain 1.56
BCAL0269 Putative oxidoreductase 1.59
BCAL0278 Putative type IV pilus secretin 1.58
BCAL0290 Glutamate synthase small subunit 1.78
BCAL0292 2′,5′ RNA ligase family protein 1.66
BCAL0305 Putative exported protein 2.21
BCAL0366 Nitroreductase family protein 1.60
BCAL0403 Putative outer membrane-bound lytic murein 1.54
BCAL0446 Putative aminotransferase 2.86
BCAL0580 Putative chromate transport protein 1.62
BCAL0623 Putative exported protein 1.72
BCAL0624 Putative outer membrane porin protein precursor 1.62
BCAL0658 Allophanate hydrolase subunit 2 1.56
BCAL0668 Serine peptidase, family S9 unassigned 1.52
BCAL0704 d-alanyl-d-alanine carboxypeptidase 1.64
BCAL0804 Putative membrane protein 1.53
BCAL1103 Putative OsmB-like lipoprotein 2.13
BCAL1121 Hypothetical protein 1.65
BCAL1212 2-Oxoisovalerate dehydrogenase alpha subunit 3.02
BCAL1213 2-Oxoisovalerate dehydrogenase beta subunit 2.91
BCAL1214 Lipoamide acyltransferase component of 3.68
BCAL1215 Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase 2.22
BCAL1226 Major facilitator superfamily protein 1.52
BCAL1279 Putative exported protein 1.64
BCAL1468 Putative electron transport protein 1.51
BCAL1499 Putative exported protein 1.79
BCAL1539 Putative exported protein 2.30
BCAL1657 Putative ribose transport system 1.77
BCAL1658 Putative ribose ABC transporter ATP-binding 1.56
BCAL1671 Metallo peptidase, subfamily M23B 1.61
BCAL1678 Putative outer membrane usher protein precursor 2.40
BCAL1699 Putative l-ornithine 5-monooxygenase 1.61
BCAL1715 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.53c
BCAL1749 Putative CoA-transferase 2.39
BCAL1750 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.39d
BCAL1751 Glyoxalase/bleomycin resistance 1.70
BCAL1754 Major facilitator superfamily protein 3.50
BCAL1783_J_0 TonB-dependent receptor (pseudogene) 1.59
BCAL1789 Putative iron-transport protein 1.73
BCAL1798 Putative exported protein 1.95
BCAL1961 Putative exported protein 1.94
BCAL1980 Putative acyl-CoA synthetase 1.54
BCAL1992 Putative acyl-CoA thioesterase precursor 2.00
BCAL2037 Putative ureidoglycolate hydrolase 1.61
BCAL2038 Putative allantoicase 1.53
BCAL2039 Putative uricase 1.72
BCAL2040 Polysaccharide deacetylase 1.54
BCAL2044 Muramoyltetrapeptide carboxypeptidase 1.51
BCAL2083 Outer membrane protein assembly factor YaeT 1.53
BCAL2155 Putative serine acetyltransferase 1.61
BCAL2179 Enolase 1.51
BCAL2187 Putative exported protein 1.56
BCAL2191 Putative membrane protein 3.09
BCAL2272 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.57d
BCAL2357 Ketol-acid reductoisomerase 1.59
BCAL2467 Putative lipoprotein 2.10
BCAL2468 Putative membrane protein 1.91
BCAL2475a Conserved hypothetical protein 1.63d
BCAL2476 Hypothetical protein 1.73
BCAL2482 Putative outer membrane protein 3.15
BCAL2485 Putative iron–sulfur cluster-binding electron 2.12
BCAL2486 Putative iron–sulfur oxidoreductase 2.11
BCAL2488 Lysr family regulatory protein 2.07
BCAL2500 Hypothetical protein 1.67
BCAL2505 Putative membrane protein 1.55
BCAL2507 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.93c
BCAL2516 Hypothetical protein 1.70
BCAL2529 Putative transcriptional regulator 1.53
BCAL2541 Putative hydrolase 1.53
BCAL2552 Putative membrane protein 1.53
BCAL2553 Putative membrane protein 1.85
BCAL2558 Putative thioredoxin/FAD-dependent pyridine 2.09
BCAL2588 Putative transposase (fragment) 1.81
BCAL2607 Putative exported protein 2.70
BCAL2615 Putative exported outer membrane porin protein 2.16
BCAL2777 Putative N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase 1.58
BCAL2819 Putative permease protein 1.61
BCAL2911 Proline-rich exported protein 1.58
BCAL2956 Putative exported protein 1.52
BCAL3024 Putative exported protein 1.57
BCAL3033 Probable outer membrane lipoproteins carrier 1.53
BCAL3038 ABC transporter ATP-binding component 1.61
BCAL3039 ABC transporter, membrane permease 1.54
BCAL3040 ABC transporter, membrane permease 1.71
BCAL3041 Maltose-binding protein 2.09
BCAL3163 Putative nucleotidyltransferase 1.68
BCAL3203 Putative periplasmic TolB protein 1.64
BCAL3204 Putative OmpA family lipoprotein 1.68
BCAL3205 Putative exported protein 1.62
BCAL3289 Putative glycolate oxidase subunit GlcE 1.64
BCAL3297 Putative ferritin DPS-family DNA-binding 1.67
BCAL3310 Putative exported protein 1.74
BCAL3311 Putative exported protein 1.60
BCAL3314 Putative membrane protein 2.43
BCAL3362 Putative oxidoreductase 1.77
BCAL3364 Putative gluconokinase 1.66
BCAL3473 Putative outer membrane porin 1.87
BCAL3486 Putative RNA polymerase sigma factor, sigma-70 1.84
BCAL3490 Putative exported protein 1.96
BCAL3492 Putative exported protein 1.63
BCAM0027 PadR family regulatory protein 1.51
BCAM0042 Putative aldo/keto reductase 1.75
BCAM0047 Putative transporter – LysE family 2.57
BCAM0094 Xylulose kinase 1.67
BCAM0126 Putative AMP-binding enzyme 1.65
BCAM0166 NADH dehydrogenase 1.66
BCAM0178 Putative periplasmic solute-binding protein 2.74
BCAM0195 Putative non-ribosomal peptide synthetase 1.53
BCAM0207 Putative tyrosine-protein kinase 1.61
BCAM0235 Putative sodium bile acid symporter family 1.51
BCAM0271 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.66d
BCAM0273 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.08d
BCAM0274a Hypothetical protein 1.95
BCAM0275 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.60d
BCAM0275a Conserved hypothetical protein 1.70d
BCAM0277 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.72c
BCAM0303 ABC transporter ATP-binding membrane protein 1.62
BCAM0368 Putative branched-chain amino acid transport 1.52
BCAM0414 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.01d
BCAM0415 Putative betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase 1.53
BCAM0422 LuxR superfamily regulatory protein 1.89
BCAM0447 Putative exported multicopper oxidase 13.01
BCAM0459 Cysteine desulfurase 3.60
BCAM0478 Glucosamine – fructose-6-phosphate 1.52
BCAM0502 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.78c
BCAM0595 LysR family regulatory protein 2.56
BCAM0630 Putative dehydrogenase 1.73
BCAM0676 Putative exported protein 1.84
BCAM0880 Putative methyltransferase 7.10
BCAM0895 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.55c
BCAM0926 Multidrug efflux system transporter protein 5.89
BCAM0944 Putative lipoprotein 1.58
BCAM0983 3-Isopropylmalate dehydratase large subunit 2.87
BCAM0983A Putative entericidin B-like bacteriolytic toxin 2.01
BCAM0984 3-Isopropylmalate dehydratase small subunit 2.08
BCAM0985 3-Isopropylmalate dehydrogenase 1.55
BCAM1016 Putative ribonuclease 1.81
BCAM1053 Putative reverse transcriptase – Group II 1.72
BCAM1150 3-Hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase 1.64
BCAM1151 Methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase 2.40
BCAM1171 Major facilitator superfamily protein 1.55
BCAM1187 TonB-dependent siderophore receptor 1.71
BCAM1207 ABC transporter ATP-binding membrane protein 1.52
BCAM1263 Putative malate/l-lactate dehydrogenase 1.79
BCAM1279 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.54d
BCAM1313 Putative amidase accessory protein 1.60
BCAM1315 Aliphatic amidase (acylamide amidohydrolase) 1.55
BCAM1330 Putative polysaccharide export protein 1.73
BCAM1333 Putative exopolysaccharide acyltransferase 1.56
BCAM1341 Conserved hypothetical protein 3.22c
BCAM1374 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.87c
BCAM1390 Putative aldolase 3.00
BCAM1425 Putative membrane protein 2.88
BCAM1427 LysE family transporter 3.76
BCAM1487 Putative ABC transporter, substrate-binding 3.14
BCAM1488 Putative proline racemase 1.90
BCAM1527 Putative cation efflux protein 1.82
BCAM1563 ABC transporter ATP-binding membrane protein 1.70
BCAM1679 Putative lysylphosphatidylglycerol synthetase 1.62
BCAM1726 Putative exported protein 2.01
BCAM1742 Putative exported protein 1.87
BCAM1775 Putative transglycosylase associated protein 1.76
BCAM1823 Putative methyltransferase 1.52
BCAM1901 Hypothetical phage protein 1.65
BCAM1904 Hypothetical phage protein 1.58
BCAM1911 Hypothetical phage protein 1.65
BCAM1946 Putative quinoxaline efflux system transporter 1.61
BCAM1957 ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 1.56
BCAM1964 Putative exported protein 1.57
BCAM2007 TonB-dependent siderophore receptor 1.58
BCAM2025 Sigma-54 interacting regulatory protein 1.87
BCAM2051 Type III secretion system protein 1.73
BCAM2073 Putative exported protein 2.98
BCAM2095 Putative HTH transcriptional regulator 1.57
BCAM2096 Putative gamma-glutamylputrescine 1.87
BCAM2119 Carboxylesterase 1.81
BCAM2162 MarR family regulatory protein 1.99
BCAM2191 Enoyl-CoA hydratase/isomerase family 1.94
BCAM2192 Enoyl-CoA hydratase/isomerase family protein 2.37
BCAM2193 Putative 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase 2.39
BCAM2194 Methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase 2.26
BCAM2195 Putative AMP-binding enzyme 2.51
BCAM2196 Putative acyl-CoA dehydrogenase 2.10
BCAM2237 Putative 2,2-dialkylglycine decarboxylase 2.41
BCAM2260 Major facilitator superfamily protein 1.61
BCAM2338 Putative glycosyltransferase 1.53
BCAM2356 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.63d
BCAM2453 Putative redoxin protein 1.69
BCAM2479 Putative transporter – LysE family 1.54
BCAM2488 Putative phosphoglycerate/bisphosphoglycerate 1.56
BCAM2504 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.84c
BCAM2542 Fenitrothion hydrolase protein FedA 1.57
BCAM2618 Putative periplasmic 1.64
BCAM2623 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.05c
BCAM2647 Putative membrane protein 1.71
BCAM2648 NAD dependent epimerase/dehydratase family 1.61
BCAM2685 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.11c
BCAM2700 Putative membrane protein 1.81
BCAM2701 Aconitate hydratase 1 2.66
BCAM2702 2-Methylcitrate synthase 5.88
BCAM2703 Probable methylisocitrate lyase 2.78
BCAM2730 Putative tripeptide permease 1.54
BCAS0028 Succinylglutamate desuccinylase/aspartoacylase 2.80
BCAS0043 Putative l-lysine 6-monooxygenase 3.11
BCAS0050 Putative amidohydrolase 1.53
BCAS0053 FMN reductase 2.34
BCAS0097 Putative cobalamin synthesis protein 1.66
BCAS0100 Putative ribokinase 1.52
BCAS0230 Putative sugar ABC transporter ATP-binding 1.58
BCAS0251 Putative lipoprotein 1.61
BCAS0260 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.29d
BCAS0278 Tartrate dehydrogenase 1.66
BCAS0308 Putative flp type pilus assembly protein 2.44
BCAS0362 Putative ketopantoate reductase 1.58
BCAS0397 Metallo peptidase, subfamily M20D 2.01
BCAS0436 AraC family regulatory protein 1.66
BCAS0443 Putative binding-protein-dependent transport 5.32
BCAS0449 Putative binding-protein-dependent transport 1.62
BCAS0461 Putative lipoprotein 3.69
BCAS0463 Putative membrane protein 1.64
BCAS0477 Putative lipoprotein 2.07
BCAS0482 Conserved hypothetical protein 4.89c
BCAS0513 Putative phage tail protein 1.54
BCAS0519 Hypothetical phage protein 1.64
BCAS0543 Putative phage transcriptional regulator 1.84
BCAS0545 Hypothetical phage protein 1.55
BCAS0547 Putative phage DNA-binding protein 1.54
BCAS0552 Hypothetical phage protein 1.72
BCAS0569 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.31d
BCAS0574 Amino acid ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 3.67
BCAS0575 Putative binding-protein-dependent transport 2.02
BCAS0577 Periplasmic solute-binding protein 1.54
BCAS0587_J_0 Aminopyrrolnitrin oxidase PrnD (fragment) 2.33
BCAS0588 Putative membrane protein (fragment) 1.52
BCAS0672 Hypothetical protein 1.91
BCAS0713 Putative short-chain oxidoreductase 1.66
BCAS0730 Putative Na+ dependent nucleoside transporter 2.13
BCAS0750 Putative exported protein 1.82
pBCA001 Putative partition protein 1.93
pBCA002 Putative partitioning protein 1.52
pBCA008 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.48d
pBCA009 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.74d
pBCA010 Putative membrane protein 3.19
pBCA012 Hypothetical protein 3.34
pBCA013 Putative exported protein 6.32
pBCA014 Putative membrane protein 3.28
pBCA015 Hypothetical protein 2.71
pBCA016 Conserved hypothetical protein 6.54d
pBCA017 Conserved hypothetical protein 3.24d
pBCA018 Hypothetical protein 8.91
pBCA019 Putative membrane protein 2.40
pBCA020 Putative TraG conjugative transfer protein 5.51
pBCA021 Putative TraH conjugative transfer protein 13.21
pBCA022 Conserved hypothetical protein 8.09c
pBCA023 Conserved hypothetical protein 5.09d
pBCA024 Conserved hypothetical protein 10.16c
pBCA025 Putative TraF conjugative transfer protein 7.10
pBCA026 Putative membrane protein 10.57
pBCA027 Putative conjugative transfer protein TraN 14.73
pBCA028 Conserved hypothetical protein 5.03d
pBCA029 Putative membrane protein 8.60
pBCA030 Putative conjugative transfer protein TrbC 6.06
pBCA031 Putative TraU conjugative transfer protein 6.92
pBCA032 Putative TraW conjugative transfer protein 8.96
pBCA033 Putative peptidase protein 4.97
pBCA034 Putative membrane protein 6.01
pBCA035 GntR family regulatory protein 18.91
pBCA036 Putative membrane protein 13.82
pBCA037 Putative membrane protein 7.33
pBCA037a Hypothetical protein 11.90
pBCA038 Hypothetical protein 9.54
pBCA039 Hypothetical protein 1.98
pBCA040 Hypothetical protein 2.04
pBCA041 Putative TraC conjugative transfer protein 9.20
pBCA042 Type IV secretion system TraV 19.71
pBCA043 Thiol:disulfide interchange protein DsbC 7.91
pBCA044 Putative TraB conjugative transfer protein 3.00
pBCA045 Putative exported protein TraK 12.43
pBCA046 Putative TraE conjugative transfer protein 16.87
pBCA047 Type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraL 46.07
pBCA048 Putative membrane protein 55.79
pBCA049 Putative transglycosylase protein 4.97
pBCA050 Hypothetical protein 8.74
pBCA051 LamB/YcsF family protein 159.40
pBCA052 Putative exported protein 789.20
pBCA053 Putative extracellular solute-binding protein 480.70
pBCA054 LuxR family regulatory protein 3.90
pBCA056 Hypothetical protein 4.34
pBCA057 Putative conjugative transfer protein 4.80
pBCA058 Thiol:disulfide interchange protein DsbD 7.43
pBCA059 Putative TraD conjugative transfer protein 4.13
pBCA060 Hypothetical protein 6.97
pBCA062 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.52d
pBCA065 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.53c
pBCA076 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.55c
pBCA077 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.66d
pBCA087 NUDIX hydrolase family protein 1.53
pBCA088 Amidohydrolase family protein 1.64
pBCA090 Putative integrase 1.68
pBCA095 Putative ligase 1.59

aDerived from B. cenocepacia J2315 (Holden et al., 2009) at http://www.burkholderia.com (Winsor et al., 2008) or http://www.microbesonline.org (Dehal et al., 2009).

bFold change of RNA recovered from rat lungs (in vivo) relative to RNA isolated from in vitro grown cultures as determined by microarray analysis.

cConserved hypothetical protein in one or more members of the Bcc and in B. pseudomallei.

dConserved hypothetical protein in one or more members of the Bcc.

Table A2.

Burkholderia cenocepacia genes induced during culture in vitro.

Gene Annotation or predicted functiona Fold changeb
BCAL0046 Putative fatty-acid CoA ligase 1.56
BCAL0057 Putative membrane protein 2.17
BCAL0112 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.82
BCAL0113 B-type flagellar hook-associated protein 2 2.71
BCAL0114 Flagellin (type II) 8.29
BCAL0121 Aquaporin Z 3.29
BCAL0126 Chemotaxis protein MotA 2.19
BCAL0127 Chemotaxis protein MotB 2.03
BCAL0128 Chemotaxis two-component response regulator 2.96
BCAL0129 Chemotaxis two-component sensor kinase CheA 2.38
BCAL0130 Chemotaxis protein CheW 1.63
BCAL0132 Chemotaxis protein methyltransferase 2.52
BCAL0133 Putative chemoreceptor glutamine deamidase cheD 2.47
BCAL0134 Chemotaxis response regulator protein-glutamate 2.04
BCAL0135 Chemotaxis protein CheY 1.52
BCAL0136 Chemotaxis protein CheZ 2.09
BCAL0140 Flagellar biosynthetic protein FlhB 2.46
BCAL0143 Putative flagellar biosynthesis protein 1.71
BCAL0147 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 2.17
BCAL0154 Histone-like nucleoid-structuring (H-NS) 1.97
BCAL0168 Hypothetical protein 2.50
BCAL0169 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.42
BCAL0179 Hypothetical protein 1.87
BCAL0203 Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1.56
BCAL0212 Putative phenylacetic acid degradation NADH 1.63
BCAL0233 30s Ribosomal protein S10 1.59
BCAL0339 Putative lipoprotein 1.60
BCAL0341 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.75
BCAL0342 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.68
BCAL0343 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.86
BCAL0344 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.58
BCAL0345 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.78
BCAL0356 Putative quinone oxidoreductase 1.51
BCAL0404 Phenylacetate-coenzyme A ligase 1.59
BCAL0406 Probable enoyl-CoA hydratase PaaG 1.56
BCAL0412 Conserved hypothetical protein (pseudogene) 2.11
BCAL0413 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.67
BCAL0431 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.86
BCAL0432 Putative membrane protein 1.61
BCAL0434 Putative exported protein 2.13
BCAL0505 Integrase/recombinase 1.71
BCAL0511 Putative deoxygenases 1.60
BCAL0514 Putative membrane protein 2.52
BCAL0522 Flagellum-specific ATP synthase FliI 1.84
BCAL0523 Flagellar assembly protein FliH 1.63
BCAL0527 Flagellar protein FliS 3.38
BCAL0528 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.80
BCAL0543 Major facilitator superfamily protein 1.64
BCAL0561 Flagella synthesis protein FlgN 1.94
BCAL0562 Negative regulator of flagellin synthesis 2.56
BCAL0567 Flagellar hook protein 1 FlgE1 1.57
BCAL0568 Flagellar basal-body rod protein FlgF (putative 1.66
BCAL0576 Flagellar hook-associated protein 1 (HAP1) 3.18
BCAL0577 Flagellar hook-associated protein 3 (HAP3) 3.20
BCAL0621 Putative cyclic-di-GMP signaling protein 1.56
BCAL0705 Putative d-amino acid aminotransferase 1.55
BCAL0706 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.75
BCAL0744 Appr-1-p processing enzyme family protein 1.74
BCAL0771 Non-heme chloroperoxidase 1.82
BCAL0808 P-loop ATPase protein family protein 1.88
BCAL0812 Sigma-54 modulation protein 1.91
BCAL0813 Putative RNA polymerase sigma-54 factor 2.13
BCAL0831 Putative storage protein 4.32
BCAL0833 Putative Acetoacetyl-CoA reductase 1.78
BCAL0834 Putative membrane protein 2.15
BCAL0842 Putative membrane protein 2.26
BCAL0928 Conserved hypothetical protein 3.58
BCAL0947 Putative membrane protein 1.55
BCAL1055 Histidine transport system permease protein 1.74
BCAL1056 Histidine transport system permease protein 1.81
BCAL1057 Histidine ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 1.98
BCAL1058 AraC family regulatory protein 2.22
BCAL1059 Succinylornithine transaminase 1.81
BCAL1060 Putative arginine N-succinyltransferase, alpha 1.63
BCAL1061 Putative arginine N-succinyltransferase, beta 1.86
BCAL1062 Succinylglutamic semialdehyde dehydrogenase 1.90
BCAL1063 Succinylarginine dihydrolase 2.58
BCAL1064 Putative succinylglutamate desuccinylase 2.00
BCAL1065 Periplasmic solute-binding protein 1.91
BCAL1146 AraC family regulatory protein 1.73
BCAL1155 Putative maleate cis–trans isomerase 3.29
BCAL1159 Putative 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate-AMP ligase 1.52
BCAL1167 Putative exported protein 1.74
BCAL1168 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.71
BCAL1221 Putative porin 1.54
BCAL1233 Putative heat shock Hsp20-related protein 1.65
BCAL1273 Phosphate ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 1.55
BCAL1282 Putative membrane protein 2.39
BCAL1291 Putative membrane protein 1.54
BCAL1292 Putative membrane protein 1.75
BCAL1299 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.51
BCAL1300 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.98
BCAL1316 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.56
BCAL1326 Conserved hypothetical protein 8.68
BCAL1357 Putative exported protein 1.56
BCAL1359 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.54
BCAL1360 Hypothetical protein 1.85
BCAL1373 LysR family regulatory protein 1.94
BCAL1390 Endoglucanase precursor 2.00
BCAL1394 Putative exported protein 1.51
BCAL1396 Putative membrane protein 1.72
BCAL1418 Major facilitator superfamily protein 2.31
BCAL1435 Inositol 2-dehydrogenase 2.41
BCAL1452 Putative methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein 1.75
BCAL1525 Flp type pilus subunit 12.95
BCAL1525a Putative flp type pilus leader peptidase 4.62
BCAL1526 Putative flp type pilus assembly protein 2.62
BCAL1527 Flp type pilus assembly protein 2.05
BCAL1528 Flp type pilus assembly protein 2.87
BCAL1529 Flp pilus type assembly-related protein 1.93
BCAL1530 Flp pilus type assembly protein 3.56
BCAL1531 Flp type pilus assembly protein 2.02
BCAL1532 Flp type pilus assembly protein 2.40
BCAL1533 Putative lipoprotein 2.15
BCAL1534 Putative exported protein 2.81
BCAL1535 Putative membrane protein 1.71
BCAL1573 Hypothetical phage protein 1.52
BCAL1574 Hypothetical phage protein 1.56
BCAL1577 Hypothetical phage protein 2.26
BCAL1596 Hypothetical phage protein 1.66
BCAL1597 Hypothetical phage protein 1.78
BCAL1610 Periplasmic cystine-binding protein 1.59
BCAL1640 Major facilitator superfamily protein 3.38
BCAL1668 Periplasmic solute-binding protein 2.02
BCAL1677 Putative type-1 fimbrial protein 1.74
BCAL1730 Precorrin-4 C11-methyltransferase 1.71
BCAL1775 Putative demethylase oxidoreductase 1.85
BCAL1791 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.23
BCAL1818 Metallo-beta-lactamase superfamily protein 1.52
BCAL1900 Thioredoxin 1.96
BCAL1913 Putative acetoin catabolism protein 1.64
BCAL1949 Glyoxylate carboligase 1.62
BCAL2027 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.11
BCAL2054 Putative HEAT-like repeat protein 2.58
BCAL2059 Putative 2′–5′ RNA ligase 1.81
BCAL2122 Malate synthase A 1.65
BCAL2143 Ubiquinol oxidase polypeptide I 1.59
BCAL2192 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.74
BCAL2193 Ferredoxin, 2Fe–2S 1.79
BCAL2197 Putative iron–sulfur cluster scaffold protein 2.08
BCAL2198 Cysteine desulfurase 1.69
BCAL2208 Dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase component of 1.62
BCAL2210 Two-component regulatory system, sensor kinase 1.56
BCAL2253 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.73
BCAL2254 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.56
BCAL2297 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.57
BCAL2305 Putative potassium channel subunit 1.75
BCAL2309 Putative copper-related MerR family regulatory 1.52
BCAL2375 Putative membrane protein 1.79
BCAL2385 Methylglyoxal synthase 1.67
BCAL2479 Putative IstB-like ATP-binding protein 2.81
BCAL2494 Putative exported protein 53.57
BCAL2531 Hypothetical protein 1.56
BCAL2614 LysR family regulatory protein 6.70
BCAL2645 Putative OmpA family membrane protein 1.66
BCAL2671 LysR family regulatory protein 1.74
BCAL2746 Putative citrate synthase 1.79
BCAL2751 Putative ketopantoate reductase 1.68
BCAL2775 Putative 4Fe–4S cluster-binding ferredoxin 1.67
BCAL2792 Putative tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase 1.70
BCAL2793 Major facilitator superfamily protein 1.68
BCAL2847 Putative methionine aminopeptidase 1.55
BCAL2904 Conserved hypothetical protein 3.85
BCAL2969 Hypothetical phage protein 1.56
BCAL2969a Hypothetical protein 1.68
BCAL2971 Hypothetical phage protein 1.55
BCAL2973 Putative exported protein 1.64
BCAL2998 Transglycosylase associated protein 2.82
BCAL3006 Cold shock-like protein 3.81
BCAL3018 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.19
BCAL3109 Urease accessory protein 1.69
BCAL3178 LysR family regulatory protein 1.72
BCAL3179 Probable d-lactate dehydrogenase 1.91
BCAL3211 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.66
BCAL3227 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.10
BCAL3231 Hypothetical protein 1.63
BCAL3234 Glycosyltransferase 1.69
BCAL3239 Glucosyltransferase 1.84
BCAL3368 Putative regulatory protein 1.85
BCAL3427 Histone H1-like protein 2.68
BCAL3428 Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase beta chain 1.58
BCAL3457 Cell division protein FtsZ 1.71
BCAM0010 2-Amino-3-ketobutyrate coenzyme A ligase 2.03
BCAM0011 Threonine 3-dehydrogenase 1.71
BCAM0028 Putative FHA-domain protein 1.58
BCAM0030 Conserved hypothetical protein 8.45
BCAM0031 Conserved hypothetical protein 5.26
BCAM0032 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.71
BCAM0064 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.89
BCAM0067 Putative short-chain dehydrogenase 2.24
BCAM0069 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.57
BCAM0070 Putative hydrolase 1.66
BCAM0096 ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 2.32
BCAM0103 Major facilitator superfamily protein 1.65
BCAM0186 Lectin 2.64
BCAM0188 N-acyl-homoserine lactone dependent regulatory 1.57
BCAM0190 Putative aminotransferase – class III 2.44
BCAM0191 Putative non-ribosomal peptide synthetase 2.05
BCAM0192 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.65
BCAM0194 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.94
BCAM0210 Putative transferase 1.71
BCAM0288 Two-component regulatory system, response 1.52
BCAM0446 Outer membrane efflux protein 187.90
BCAM0485 LacI family regulatory protein 4.99
BCAM0487 Conserved hypothetical 1.53
BCAM0504 CsbD-like protein 2.24
BCAM0505 Putative membrane-attached protein 1.67
BCAM0507 CsbD-like protein 2.40
BCAM0521 Putative IstB-like ATP-binding protein 2.85
BCAM0522 Putative integrase 1.76
BCAM0589 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.68
BCAM0622 Two-component regulatory system, sensor kinase 1.58
BCAM0623 Two-component regulatory system, response 1.62
BCAM0633 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.67
BCAM0634 Hypothetical protein 10.80
BCAM0717 Putative Gram-negative porin 2.44
BCAM0753 Putative membrane protein 2.18
BCAM0780 Putative helicase 1.59
BCAM0851 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.83
BCAM0917 Putative DNA primase 1.64
BCAM0918 RNA polymerase sigma factor RpoD 1.52
BCAM0942 Putative exported protein 1.59
BCAM0953 Extracellular solute-binding protein 1.80
BCAM0957 Putative pepstatin-insensitive carboxyl 1.64
BCAM1041 Putative phage coiled coil domain protein 2.06
BCAM1123 ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 1.52
BCAM1138 Major facilitator superfamily protein 1.77
BCAM1140 Putative aldehyde oxidase/xanthine 1.52
BCAM1141 Putative isochorismatase 1.81
BCAM1142 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.76
BCAM1143 Putative hydrolase 1.86
BCAM1144 Putative Asp/Glu/Hydantoin racemase 2.22
BCAM1146 Putative flavoprotein monooxygenase 2.33
BCAM1147 Isoquinoline 1-oxidoreductase alpha subunit 1.98
BCAM1164 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.87
BCAM1175 Putative iron–sulfur cluster protein 1.60
BCAM1213 Putative membrane protein 2.19
BCAM1255 Putative exported protein 1.88
BCAM1265 Putative amino acid permease 1.80
BCAM1316a Conserved hypothetical protein 2.00
BCAM1316b Conserved hypothetical protein 1.54
BCAM1335 Glycosyltransferase 1.52
BCAM1358 Gluconate 2-dehydrogenase cytochrome c subunit 1.52
BCAM1411 Putative short-chain dehydrogenase 1.53
BCAM1412 Conserved hypothetical protein 10.28
BCAM1413A Conserved hypothetical protein 24.61
BCAM1414 Conserved hypothetical protein 3.86
BCAM1424 Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein 1.68
BCAM1443 Putative exported protein 2.64
BCAM1473 Putative di-haem cytochrome c peroxidase 1.67
BCAM1491 Putative exported protein 1.56
BCAM1572 Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein 1.93
BCAM1573 Alpha, alpha-trehalose-phosphate synthase 1.64
BCAM1588 Putative lyase 1.74
BCAM1602 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.59
BCAM1623 Thiolase 2.75
BCAM1643 AMP-binding protein 1.76
BCAM1704 2,3-Butanediol dehydrogenase 1.79
BCAM1710 Putative enoyl-CoA hydratase/isomerase 1.58
BCAM1711 Phenylacetate-coenzyme A ligase 1.57
BCAM1733 Putative membrane protein 2.36
BCAM1734 Putative cytochrome c 1.73
BCAM1735 Putative oxidoreductase 1.89
BCAM1736 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.84
BCAM1744 Serine peptidase, family S9 1.67
BCAM1777A Putative exported protein 4.61
BCAM1804 Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein 2.10
BCAM1869 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.85
BCAM1871 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.64
BCAM1881 Hypothetical phage protein 1.86
BCAM1882 Hypothetical phage protein 1.80
BCAM1919 Hypothetical phage protein 2.12
BCAM1920 Hypothetical phage protein 1.90
BCAM1927 Putative exported protein 1.94
BCAM2021 Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein 1.94
BCAM2024 Putative membrane protein 2.65
BCAM2048 Type III secretion ssytem protein 1.69
BCAM2052 Putative type III secretion system protein 1.85
BCAM2053 Putative type III secretion system protein 1.98
BCAM2067 Putative undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthetase 1.54
BCAM2087 Putative lipoprotein 2.24
BCAM2105 MerR family regulatory protein 1.64
BCAM2106 Non-heme chloroperoxidase 1.64
BCAM2167 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.51
BCAM2169 Putative outer membrane autotransporter 1.73
BCAM2198 Serine peptidase, family S49 2.78
BCAM2199 Putative membrane protein 2.03
BCAM2207 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.90
BCAM2210 Putative membrane protein 2.59
BCAM2215 Putative copper resistance protein C precursor 1.55
BCAM2307 Zinc metalloprotease ZmpB 2.28
BCAM2312 Putative ABC-type glycine betaine transport 2.59
BCAM2321 Putative electron transfer flavoprotein alpha 1.74
BCAM2325 Putative dipeptidase 1.75
BCAM2333 Putative glutathione-independent formaldehyde 1.73
BCAM2366 Putative proline iminopeptidase 1.57
BCAM2374 Putative methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein 2.01
BCAM2377 Putative exported protein 3.99
BCAM2378 Putative Xaa-Pro dipeptidyl-peptidase 1.63
BCAM2403 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.97
BCAM2419 Putative outer membrane protein A precursor 1.79
BCAM2444 Putative exported protein 2.52
BCAM2523 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.31
BCAM2545 Major facilitator superfamily protein 1.72
BCAM2563 Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein 1.62
BCAM2564 Putative aerotaxis receptor 3.44
BCAM2625 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.00
BCAM2640 Putative methyltransferase 1.75
BCAM2657 Putative exported protein 1.55
BCAM2670 Conserved hypothetical protein 2.03
BCAM2674 Putative cytochrome oxidase subunit I 1.88
BCAM2677 Putative membrane protein 1.76
BCAM2690 Putative thioesterase 1.71
BCAM2711 H-NS histone family protein 1.77
BCAM2712 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.57
BCAM2748 Putative sigma factor 1.53
BCAM2754 Putative ketoreductase 1.70
BCAM2771 Putative dihydrodipicolinate synthetase 1.61
BCAM2806 Putative sugar ABC transporter ATP-binding 2.87
BCAM2837_J_0 Two-component regulatory system, response 1.87
BCAM2837_J_1 Two-component regulatory system, response 2.42
BCAS0018 MarR family regulatory protein 1.55
BCAS0040 Major facilitator superfamily protein 1.55
BCAS0074 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.52
BCAS0085 Organic hydroperoxide resistance protein 1.53
BCAS0172 Putative dehydrogenase 1.51
BCAS0173 Putative tautomerase 1.60
BCAS0189 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.82
BCAS0190 Putative H-NS family DNA-binding protein 2.38
BCAS0225 LysR family regulatory protein 2.71
BCAS0226 Putative hydrolase 1.99
BCAS0256 Putative porin protein 1.51
BCAS0263 Two-component regulatory system, response 3.60
BCAS0264 Two-component regulatory system, sensor kinase 2.41
BCAS0290 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.73
BCAS0291 Periplasmic solute-binding protein 2.74
BCAS0292 Conserved hypothetical protein 10.91
BCAS0293 Nematocidal protein AidA 51.98
BCAS0294 Putative GtrA-like family protein 3.06
BCAS0295 Glycosyltransferase 1.52
BCAS0299 Flp type pilus subunit 1.68
BCAS0399 Citrate-proton symporter 5.66
BCAS0400 Putative periplasmic solute-binding protein 2.00
BCAS0403 Hypothetical protein 2.12
BCAS0406 Putative exported protein 1.64
BCAS0409 Zinc metalloprotease ZmpA 6.72
BCAS0452 Putative membrane protein 1.56
BCAS0462 Putative alpha-galactosidase 2.14
BCAS0467 Putative transcriptional regulator – DeoR 1.67
BCAS0481 Putative lipoprotein 1.86
BCAS0510 Hypothetical phage protein 2.29
BCAS0540 Hypothetical phage protein 1.72
BCAS0548 Hypothetical phage protein 1.69
BCAS0572 Putative exported protein 1.70
BCAS0573 Putative exported protein 1.72
BCAS0576 Putative binding-protein-dependent transport 1.52
BCAS0579 Putative exported protein 2.01
BCAS0595 Putative sugar efflux transporter 1.53
BCAS0596 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.58
BCAS0661C Hypothetical protein 1.83
BCAS0662 Conserved hypothetical protein 1.91
BCAS0669 Hypothetical protein 1.90
BCAS0700 Putative oxygen-insensitive NAD(P)H 1.52
BCAS0717 Hypothetical protein 2.26
BCAS0773 Putative exported protein 1.64
pBCA055 Putative membrane protein 18.16

aDerived from B. cenocepacia J2315 (Holden et al., 2009) at http://www.burkholderia.com (Winsor et al., 2008) or http://www.microbesonline.org (Dehal et al., 2009).

bFold change of RNA isolated from in vitro grown cultures relative to RNA recovered from rat lungs (in vivo) as determined by microarray analysis.

References

  1. Achard M. E., Tree J. J., Holden J. A., Simpfendorfer K. R., Wijburg O. L., Strugnell R. A., Schembri M. A., Sweet M. J., Jennings M. P., McEwan A. G. (2010). The multi-copper-ion oxidase CueO of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is required for systemic virulence. Infect. Immun. 78, 2312–2319 10.1128/IAI.01208-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aubert D. F., Flannagan R. S., Valvano M. A. (2008). A novel sensor kinase-response regulator hybrid controls biofilm formation and type VI secretion system activity in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Infect. Immun. 76, 1979–1991 10.1128/IAI.01338-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldwin A., Mahenthiralingam E., Thickett K. M., Honeybourne D., Maiden M. C., Govan J. R., Speert D. P., LiPuma J. J., Vandamme P., Dowson C. G. (2005). Multilocus sequence typing scheme that provides both species and strain differentiation for the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 4665–4673 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4665-4673.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baldwin A., Sokol P. A., Parkhill J., Mahenthiralingam E. (2004). The Burkholderia cepacia epidemic strain marker is part of a novel genomic island encoding both virulence and metabolism-associated genes in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Infect. Immun. 72, 1537–1547 10.1128/IAI.72.4.1991-2001.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bazzini S., Udine C., Sass A., Pasca M. R., Longo F., Emiliani G., Fondi M., Perrin E., Decorosi F., Viti C., Giovannetti L., Leoni L., Fani R., Riccardi G., Mahenthiralingam E., Buroni S. (2011). Deciphering the role of RND efflux transporters in Burkholderia cenocepacia. PLoS ONE 6, e18902. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernier S. P., Nguyen D. T., Sokol P. A. (2008). A LysR-type transcriptional regulator in Burkholderia cenocepacia influences colony morphology and virulence. Infect. Immun. 76, 38–47 10.1128/IAI.00874-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernier S. P., Silo-Suh L., Woods D. E., Ohman D. E., Sokol P. A. (2003). Comparative analysis of plant and animal models for characterization of Burkholderia cepacia virulence. Infect. Immun. 71, 5306–5313 10.1128/IAI.71.9.5306-5313.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bernier S. P., Sokol P. A. (2005). Use of suppression-subtractive hybridization to identify genes in the Burkholderia cepacia complex that are unique to Burkholderia cenocepacia. J. Bacteriol. 187, 5278–5291 10.1128/JB.187.15.5278-5291.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bjur E., Eriksson-Ygberg S., Aslund F., Rhen M. (2006). Thioredoxin 1 promotes intracellular replication and virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect. Immun. 74, 5140–5151 10.1128/IAI.00449-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boulanger A., Francez-Charlot A., Conter A., Castanie-Cornet M. P., Cam K., Gutierrez C. (2005). Multistress regulation in Escherichia coli: expression of osmB involves two independent promoters responding either to sigmaS or to the RcsCDB His-Asp phosphorelay. J. Bacteriol. 187, 3282–3286 10.1128/JB.187.9.3282-3286.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowe F., Lipps C. J., Tsolis R. M., Groisman E., Heffron F., Kusters J. G. (1998). At least four percent of the Salmonella typhimurium genome is required for fatal infection of mice. Infect. Immun. 66, 3372–3377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Calhoun L. N., Kwon Y. M. (2011). Structure, function and regulation of the DNA-binding protein Dps and its role in acid and oxidative stress resistance in Escherichia coli: a review. J. Appl. Microbiol. 110, 375–386 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04890.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cash H. A., Woods D. E., McCullough B., Johanson W. G., Jr., Bass J. A. (1979). A rat model of chronic respiratory infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 119, 453–459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Castonguay-Vanier J., Vial L., Tremblay J., Deziel E. (2010). Drosophila melanogaster as a model host for the Burkholderia cepacia complex. PLoS ONE 5, e11467. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Coenye T., Van Acker H., Peeters E., Sass A., Buroni S., Riccardi G., Mahenthiralingam E. (2011). Molecular mechanisms of chlorhexidine tolerance in Burkholderia cenocepacia biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55, 1912–1919 10.1128/AAC.01571-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Corbett C. R., Burtnick M. N., Kooi C., Woods D. E., Sokol P. A. (2003). An extracellular zinc metalloprotease gene of Burkholderia cepacia. Microbiology 149, 2263–2271 10.1099/mic.0.26243-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. de Bentzmann S., Aurouze M., Ball G., Filloux A. (2006). FppA, a novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa prepilin peptidase involved in assembly of type IVb pili. J. Bacteriol. 188, 4851–4860 10.1128/JB.00345-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dehal P. S., Joachimiak M. P., Price M. N., Bates J. T., Baumohl J. K., Chivian D., Friedland G. D., Huang K. H., Keller K., Novichkov P. S., Dubchak I. L., Alm E. J., Arkin A. P. (2009). MicrobesOnline: an integrated portal for comparative and functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D396–D400 10.1093/nar/gkp919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Drevinek P., Holden M. T., Ge Z., Jones A. M., Ketchell I., Gill R. T., Mahenthiralingam E. (2008). Gene expression changes linked to antimicrobial resistance, oxidative stress, iron depletion and retained motility are observed when Burkholderia cenocepacia grows in cystic fibrosis sputum. BMC Infect. Dis. 8, 121. 10.1186/1471-2334-8-121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Engledow A. S., Medrano E. G., Mahenthiralingam E., LiPuma J. J., Gonzalez C. F. (2004). Involvement of a plasmid-encoded type IV secretion system in the plant tissue watersoaking phenotype of Burkholderia cenocepacia. J. Bacteriol. 186, 6015–6024 10.1128/JB.186.18.6015-6024.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fehlner-Gardiner C. C., Hopkins T. M., Valvano M. A. (2002). Identification of a general secretory pathway in a human isolate of Burkholderia vietnamiensis (formerly B. cepacia complex genomovar V) that is required for the secretion of hemolysin and phospholipase C activities. Microb. Pathog. 32, 249–254 10.1006/mpat.2002.0503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Flannagan R. S., Aubert D., Kooi C., Sokol P. A., Valvano M. A. (2007). Burkholderia cenocepacia requires a periplasmic HtrA protease for growth under thermal and osmotic stress and for survival in vivo. Infect. Immun. 75, 1679–1689 10.1128/IAI.01581-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gerdes K., Christensen S. K., Lobner-Olesen A. (2005). Prokaryotic toxin-antitoxin stress response loci. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 371–382 10.1038/nrmicro1147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gingues S., Kooi C., Visser M. B., Subsin B., Sokol P. A. (2005). Distribution and expression of the ZmpA metalloprotease in the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J. Bacteriol. 187, 8247–8255 10.1128/JB.187.24.8247-8255.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Glendinning K. J., Parsons Y. N., Duangsonk K., Hales B. A., Humphreys D., Hart C. A., Winstanley C. (2004). Sequence divergence in type III secretion gene clusters of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 235, 229–235 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2004.tb09593.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Godlewska R., Wisniewska K., Pietras Z., Jagusztyn-Krynicka E. K. (2009). Peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein (Pal) of Gram-negative bacteria: function, structure, role in pathogenesis and potential application in immunoprophylaxis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 298, 1–11 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01659.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hall S. J., Hitchcock A., Butler C. S., Kelly D. J. (2008). A multicopper oxidase (Cj1516) and a CopA homologue (Cj1161) are major components of the copper homeostasis system of Campylobacter jejuni. J. Bacteriol. 190, 8075–8085 10.1128/JB.00821-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hellman J., Roberts J. D., Jr., Tehan M. M., Allaire J. E., Warren H. S. (2002). Bacterial peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein is released into the bloodstream in Gram-negative sepsis and causes inflammation and death in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 14274–14280 10.1074/jbc.M109696200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Holden M. T., Seth-Smith H. M., Crossman L. C., Sebaihia M., Bentley S. D., Cerdeno-Tarraga A. M., Thomson N. R., Bason N., Quail M. A., Sharp S., Cherevach I., Churcher C., Goodhead I., Hauser H., Holroyd N., Mungall K., Scott P., Walker D., White B., Rose H., Iversen P., Mil-Homens D., Rocha E. P., Fialho A. M., Baldwin A., Dowson C., Barrell B. G., Govan J. R., Vandamme P., Hart C. A., Mahenthiralingam E., Parkhill J. (2009). The genome of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315, an epidemic pathogen of cystic fibrosis patients. J. Bacteriol. 191, 261–277 10.1128/JB.01230-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Huber B., Feldmann F., Kothe M., Vandamme P., Wopperer J., Riedel K., Eberl L. (2004). Identification of a novel virulence factor in Burkholderia cenocepacia H111 required for efficient slow killing of Caenorhabditis elegans. Infect. Immun. 72, 7220–7230 10.1128/IAI.72.12.7220-7230.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hunt T. A., Kooi C., Sokol P. A., Valvano M. A. (2004). Identification of Burkholderia cenocepacia genes required for bacterial survival in vivo. Infect. Immun. 72, 4010–4022 10.1128/IAI.72.7.4010-4022.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Huston W. M., Jennings M. P., McEwan A. G. (2002). The multicopper oxidase of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ferroxidase with a central role in iron acquisition. Mol. Microbiol. 45, 1741–1750 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03132.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Inoue T., Shingaki R., Sogawa N., Sogawa C. A., Asaumi J., Kokeguchi S., Fukui K. (2003). Biofilm formation by a fimbriae-deficient mutant of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Microbiol. Immunol. 47, 877–881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Isles A., Maclusky I., Corey M., Gold R., Prober C., Fleming P., Levison H. (1984). Pseudomonas cepacia infection in cystic fibrosis: an emerging problem. J. Pediatr. 104, 206–210 10.1016/S0022-3476(84)80993-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jung J. U., Gutierrez C., Martin F., Ardourel M., Villarejo M. (1990). Transcription of osmB, a gene encoding an Escherichia coli lipoprotein, is regulated by dual signals. Osmotic stress and stationary phase. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 10574–10581 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kachlany S. C., Planet P. J., Desalle R., Fine D. H., Figurski D. H., Kaplan J. B. (2001). flp-1, the first representative of a new pilin gene subfamily, is required for non-specific adherence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Mol. Microbiol. 40, 542–554 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02422.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim H. S., Schell M. A., Yu Y., Ulrich R. L., Sarria S. H., Nierman W. C., Deshazer D. (2005). Bacterial genome adaptation to niches: divergence of the potential virulence genes in three Burkholderia species of different survival strategies. BMC Genomics 6, 174. 10.1186/1471-2164-6-174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Koh Y. S., Roe J. H. (1995). Isolation of a novel paraquat-inducible (pqi) gene regulated by the soxRS locus in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 177, 2673–2678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kooi C., Subsin B., Chen R., Pohorelic B., Sokol P. A. (2006). Burkholderia cenocepacia ZmpB is a broad-specificity zinc metalloprotease involved in virulence. Infect. Immun. 74, 4083–4093 10.1128/IAI.00297-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kothe M., Antl M., Huber B., Stoecker K., Ebrecht D., Steinmetz I., Eberl L. (2003). Killing of Caenorhabditis elegans by Burkholderia cepacia is controlled by the cep quorum-sensing system. Cell. Microbiol. 5, 343–351 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00280.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Krachler A. M., Sharma A., Cauldwell A., Papadakos G., Kleanthous C. (2010). TolA modulates the oligomeric status of YbgF in the bacterial periplasm. J. Mol. Biol. 403, 270–285 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.08.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liang M. D., Bagchi A., Warren H. S., Tehan M. M., Trigilio J. A., Beasley-Topliffe L. K., Tesini B. L., Lazzaroni J. C., Fenton M. J., Hellman J. (2005). Bacterial peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein: a naturally occurring toll-like receptor 2 agonist that is shed into serum and has synergy with lipopolysaccharide. J. Infect. Dis. 191, 939–948 10.1086/427815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. LiPuma J. J. (2010). The changing microbial epidemiology in cystic fibrosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23, 299–323 10.1128/CMR.00068-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Loutet S. A., Flannagan R. S., Kooi C., Sokol P. A., Valvano M. A. (2006). A complete lipopolysaccharide inner core oligosaccharide is required for resistance of Burkholderia cenocepacia to antimicrobial peptides and bacterial survival in vivo. J. Bacteriol. 188, 2073–2080 10.1128/JB.188.6.2073-2080.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Loutet S. A., Valvano M. A. (2010). A decade of Burkholderia cenocepacia virulence determinant research. Infect. Immun. 78, 4088–4100 10.1128/IAI.00212-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mahenthiralingam E., Baldwin A., Dowson C. G. (2008). Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria: opportunistic pathogens with important natural biology. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104, 1539–1551 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03706.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mahenthiralingam E., Campbell M. E., Speert D. P. (1994). Nonmotility and phagocytic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from chronically colonized patients with cystic fibrosis. Infect. Immun. 62, 596–605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mahenthiralingam E., Coenye T., Chung J. W., Speert D. P., Govan J. R., Taylor P., Vandamme P. (2000). Diagnostically and experimentally useful panel of strains from the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38, 910–913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mahenthiralingam E., Urban T. A., Goldberg J. B. (2005). The multifarious, multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 144–156 10.1038/nrmicro1085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Makidon P. E., Knowlton J., Groom J. V., II, Blanco L. P., LiPuma J. J., Bielinska A. U., Baker J. R., Jr. (2010). Induction of immune response to the 17 kDa OMPA Burkholderia cenocepacia polypeptide and protection against pulmonary infection in mice after nasal vaccination with an OMP nanoemulsion-based vaccine. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 199, 81–92 10.1007/s00430-009-0137-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Marolda C. L., Hauroder B., John M. A., Michel R., Valvano M. A. (1999). Intracellular survival and saprophytic growth of isolates from the Burkholderia cepacia complex in free-living amoebae. Microbiology 145(Pt 7), 1509–1517 10.1099/13500872-145-7-1509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mougous J. D., Cuff M. E., Raunser S., Shen A., Zhou M., Gifford C. A., Goodman A. L., Joachimiak G., Ordonez C. L., Lory S., Walz T., Joachimiak A., Mekalanos J. J. (2006). A virulence locus of Pseudomonas aeruginosa encodes a protein secretion apparatus. Science 312, 1526–1530 10.1126/science.1128393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Munoz-Elias E. J., McKinney J. D. (2005). Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate lyases 1 and 2 are jointly required for in vivo growth and virulence. Nat. Med. 11, 638–644 10.1038/nm1252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Munoz-Elias E. J., Upton A. M., Cherian J., McKinney J. D. (2006). Role of the methylcitrate cycle in Mycobacterium tuberculosis metabolism, intracellular growth, and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 60, 1109–1122 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05155.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mutschler H., Gebhardt M., Shoeman R. L., Meinhart A. (2011). A novel mechanism of programmed cell death in bacteria by toxin-antitoxin systems corrupts peptidoglycan synthesis. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001033. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. O’Grady E. P., Nguyen D. T., Weisskopf L., Eberl L., Sokol P. A. (2011). The Burkholderia cenocepacia LysR-type transcriptional regulator ShvR influences expression of quorum-sensing, protease, type II secretion, and afc genes. J. Bacteriol. 193, 163–176 10.1128/JB.00852-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. O’Grady E. P., Viteri D. F., Malott R. J., Sokol P. A. (2009). Reciprocal regulation by the CepIR and CciIR quorum sensing systems in Burkholderia cenocepacia. BMC Genomics 10, 441. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Paterson G. K., Northen H., Cone D. B., Willers C., Peters S. E., Maskell D. J. (2009). Deletion of tolA in Salmonella typhimurium generates an attenuated strain with vaccine potential. Microbiology 155, 220–228 10.1099/mic.0.021576-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Peeters E., Sass A., Mahenthiralingam E., Nelis H., Coenye T. (2010). Transcriptional response of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 sessile cells to treatments with high doses of hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite. BMC Genomics 11, 90. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Potter A. J., Kidd S. P., Edwards J. L., Falsetta M. L., Apicella M. A., Jennings M. P., McEwan A. G. (2009). Thioredoxin reductase is essential for protection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae against killing by nitric oxide and for bacterial growth during interaction with cervical epithelial cells. J. Infect. Dis. 199, 227–235 10.1086/595737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Rozen S., Skaletsky H. (2000). Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol. Biol. 132, 365–386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sajjan S. U., Carmody L. A., Gonzalez C. F., LiPuma J. J. (2008). A type IV secretion system contributes to intracellular survival and replication of Burkholderia cenocepacia. Infect. Immun. 76, 5447–5455 10.1128/IAI.00451-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sass A., Marchbank A., Tullis E., Lipuma J. J., Mahenthiralingam E. (2011). Spontaneous and evolutionary changes in the antibiotic resistance of Burkholderia cenocepacia observed by global gene expression analysis. BMC Genomics 12, 373. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Schmittgen T. D., Livak K. J. (2008). Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1101–1108 10.1038/nprot.2008.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Schnappinger D., Ehrt S., Voskuil M. I., Liu Y., Mangan J. A., Monahan I. M., Dolganov G., Efron B., Butcher P. D., Nathan C., Schoolnik G. K. (2003). Transcriptional adaptation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis within macrophages: insights into the phagosomal environment. J. Exp. Med. 198, 693–704 10.1084/jem.20030846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Seed K. D., Dennis J. J. (2008). Development of Galleria mellonella as an alternative infection model for the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Infect. Immun. 76, 1267–1275 10.1128/IAI.01249-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sisinni L., Cendron L., Favaro G., Zanotti G. (2010). Helicobacter pylori acidic stress response factor HP1286 is a YceI homolog with new binding specificity. FEBS J. 277, 1896–1905 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07612.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Smith A. W., Roche H., Trombe M. C., Briles D. E., Hakansson A. (2002). Characterization of the dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase from Streptococcus pneumoniae and its role in pneumococcal infection. Mol. Microbiol. 44, 431–448 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02891.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sokol P. A., Darling P., Lewenza S., Corbett C. R., Kooi C. D. (2000). Identification of a siderophore receptor required for ferric ornibactin uptake in Burkholderia cepacia. Infect. Immun. 68, 6554–6560 10.1128/IAI.68.12.6554-6560.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sokol P. A., Darling P., Woods D. E., Mahenthiralingam E., Kooi C. (1999). Role of ornibactin biosynthesis in the virulence of Burkholderia cepacia: characterization of pvdA, the gene encoding l-Ornithine N5 -oxygenase. Infect. Immun. 67, 4443–4455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sokol P. A., Sajjan U., Visser M. B., Gingues S., Forstner J., Kooi C. (2003). The CepIR quorum-sensing system contributes to the virulence of Burkholderia cenocepacia respiratory infections. Microbiology 149, 3649–3658 10.1099/mic.0.26540-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Somvanshi V. S., Viswanathan P., Jacobs J. L., Mulks M. H., Sundin G. W., Ciche T. A. (2010). The type 2 secretion pseudopilin, gspJ, is required for multihost pathogenicity of Burkholderia cenocepacia AU1054. Infect. Immun. 78, 4110–4121 10.1128/IAI.00558-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Subramoni S., Nguyen D. T., Sokol P. A. (2011). Burkholderia cenocepacia ShvR-regulated genes that influence colony morphology, biofilm formation, and virulence. Infect. Immun. 79, 2984–2997 10.1128/IAI.00170-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Tomich M., Griffith A., Herfst C. A., Burns J. L., Mohr C. D. (2003). Attenuated virulence of a Burkholderia cepacia type III secretion mutant in a murine model of infection. Infect. Immun. 71, 1405–1415 10.1128/IAI.71.3.1405-1415.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Tomich M., Herfst C. A., Golden J. W., Mohr C. D. (2002). Role of flagella in host cell invasion by Burkholderia cepacia. Infect. Immun. 70, 1799–1806 10.1128/IAI.70.4.1799-1806.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Tuanyok A., Tom M., Dunbar J., Woods D. E. (2006). Genome-wide expression analysis of Burkholderia pseudomallei infection in a hamster model of acute melioidosis. Infect. Immun. 74, 5465–5476 10.1128/IAI.00737-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Uehlinger S., Schwager S., Bernier S. P., Riedel K., Nguyen D. T., Sokol P. A., Eberl L. (2009). Identification of specific and universal virulence factors in Burkholderia cenocepacia strains by using multiple infection hosts. Infect. Immun. 77, 4102–4110 10.1128/IAI.00398-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Urban T. A., Griffith A., Torok A. M., Smolkin M. E., Burns J. L., Goldberg J. B. (2004). Contribution of Burkholderia cenocepacia flagella to infectivity and inflammation. Infect. Immun. 72, 5126–5134 10.1128/IAI.72.9.5126-5134.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Van Melderen L., Saavedra De Bast M. (2009). Bacterial toxin-antitoxin systems: more than selfish entities? PLoS Genet. 5, e1000437. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Velasco-Garcia R., Villalobos M. A., Ramirez-Romero M. A., Mujica-Jimenez C., Iturriaga G., Munoz-Clares R. A. (2006a). Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: cloning, over-expression in Escherichia coli, and regulation by choline and salt. Arch. Microbiol. 185, 14–22 10.1007/s00203-005-0054-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Velasco-Garcia R., Zaldivar-Machorro V. J., Mujica-Jimenez C., Gonzalez-Segura L., Munoz-Clares R. A. (2006b). Disulfiram irreversibly aggregates betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase – a potential target for antimicrobial agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 341, 408–415 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Vergunst A. C., Meijer A. H., Renshaw S. A., O’Callaghan D. (2010). Burkholderia cenocepacia creates an intramacrophage replication niche in zebrafish embryos, followed by bacterial dissemination and establishment of systemic infection. Infect. Immun. 78, 1495–1508 10.1128/IAI.00743-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Visser M. B., Majumdar S., Hani E., Sokol P. A. (2004). Importance of the ornibactin and pyochelin siderophore transport systems in Burkholderia cenocepacia lung infections. Infect. Immun. 72, 2850–2857 10.1128/IAI.72.5.2850-2857.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Weber A., Kogl S. A., Jung K. (2006). Time-dependent proteome alterations under osmotic stress during aerobic and anaerobic growth in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 188, 7165–7175 10.1128/JB.188.4.1405-1410.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Weingart C. L., White C. E., Liu S., Chai Y., Cho H., Tsai C. S., Wei Y., Delay N. R., Gronquist M. R., Eberhard A., Winans S. C. (2005). Direct binding of the quorum sensing regulator CepR of Burkholderia cenocepacia to two target promoters in vitro. Mol. Microbiol. 57, 452–467 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04656.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Werner J., Misra R. (2005). YaeT (Omp85) affects the assembly of lipid-dependent and lipid-independent outer membrane proteins of Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 57, 1450–1459 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04775.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Winsor G. L., Khaira B., Van Rossum T., Lo R., Whiteside M. D., Brinkman F. S. (2008). The Burkholderia Genome Database: facilitating flexible queries and comparative analyses. Bioinformatics 24, 2803–2804 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wolfgang M. C., Jyot J., Goodman A. L., Ramphal R., Lory S. (2004). Pseudomonas aeruginosa regulates flagellin expression as part of a global response to airway fluid from cystic fibrosis patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 6664–6668 10.1073/pnas.0307553101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wright J. R., Clements J. A. (1987). Metabolism and turnover of lung surfactant. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 136, 426–444 10.1164/ajrccm/136.2.426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Yoder-Himes D. R., Chain P. S., Zhu Y., Wurtzel O., Rubin E. M., Tiedje J. M., Sorek R. (2009). Mapping the Burkholderia cenocepacia niche response via high-throughput sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 3976–3981 10.1073/pnas.0813403106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Yoder-Himes D. R., Konstantinidis K. T., Tiedje J. M. (2010). Identification of potential therapeutic targets for Burkholderia cenocepacia by comparative transcriptomics. PLoS ONE 5, e8724. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Zaldivar-Machorro V. J., Lopez-Ortiz M., Demare P., Regla I., Munoz-Clares R. A. (2011). The disulfiram metabolites S-methyl-N,N-diethyldithiocarbamoyl sulfoxide and S-methyl-N,N-diethylthiocarbamoyl sulfone irreversibly inactivate betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, both in vitro and in situ, and arrest bacterial growth. Biochimie 93, 286–295 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.09.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES