Table 1. Progesterone indices in ovulatory cycles.
Index | x | y | Sample‡ | n | Median | Mean | SEM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mF* | First observed day + 2 | -15.5 | Bolivia rural: all | 118 | 74 | 77 | 3.3 |
Bol rural: conceiving | 10 | 74 | 72 | 7.5 | |||
Chicago: all | 20 | 92 | 100 | 10.1 | |||
Chicago: conceiving | 10 | 122 | 108 | 14.6 | |||
Mean luteal† | -0.5 | -14.5 | Bolivia rural: all | 118 | 152 | 163 | 5.0 |
Bol rural: conceiving | 10 | 143 | 152 | 11.6 | |||
Chicago: all | 20 | 268 | 242 | 21.5 | |||
Chicago: conceiving | 10 | 311 | 264 | 31.6 | |||
mPL† | Day of peak -2.5 | Day of peak +2.5 | Bolivia rural: all | 118 | 222 | 237 | 7.5 |
Bol rural: conceiving | 10 | 217 | 209 | 17.7 | |||
Chicago: all | 20 | 355 | 336 | 29.1 | |||
Chicago: conceiving | 10 | 388 | 363 | 42.6 |
Index is defined as (integral of P from x to y)/(y - x); cycles aligned on first day of subsequent cycle; units are pmol/liter.
Bolivia rural vs. Chicago ovulatory cycles, Mann-Whitney test, P < 0.02
Bolivia rural vs. Chicago ovulatory cycles, Mann-Whitney test, P < 0.002
Within population, ovulatory cycles of conceiving vs. nonconceiving women, Mann-Whitney, not significant