Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 3;2:4. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00004

Table 3.

Susceptibility* of Campylobacter concisus to 30 antimicrobial agents.

Antibiotic Tanner et al. (1981) Johnson et al. (1986) Aabenhus et al. (2005b)#
Vandenberg et al. (2006) Bergey’s (Vandamme et al., 2005)
Group 1 Group 2
Amikacin >64
Ampicillin 1.5 0.38 2.0
Bacitracin >128 128
Cefazolin >128
Cefoperazone >128
Cefotaxime 4.0
Cefoxitin >128
Ceftazidime 64
Ceftriaxone 2.0 0.5
Chloramphenicol 4.0 4.0 4.0
Ciprofloxacin ≤1.0 0.094 0.125 0.25
Clindamycin 2.0–4.0 1.0 24
Colistin 0.5–1.0 0.5–1.0
Erythromycin 4.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0
Gentamicin 2.0–4.0 >32 1.0 24
Imipenem ≤1.0
Kanamycin 1.0–2.0 12
Mecillinam 3.0 3.0
Metronidazole 0.5–2.0 1.0 0.5–2.0
Minocycline 2.0 2.0
Moxalactam 128
Nalidixic acid 64–128 32 64–128
Neomycin 16–32 16–32
Penicillin 0.5–4.0 8.0 0.5–4.0
Piperacillin 256
Polymixin B ≤0.25–1.0 0.25–1.0
Rifampin 16–64 16–64
Streptomycin 1.0–2.0 12
Tetracycline 1.0–2.0 1.0 0.5 0.75 0.5 12
Vancomycin >128 128

*MIC90 represents the MIC that completely inhibited visible growth of 90% of the strains. #C. concisus strains were split into two groups based on their protein profiles.