Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun;166(3):912–923. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01660.x

Table 1.

Expression, chemotaxis and binding properties of CXCR3 mutants

Construct % of WT CXCR3 surface expression % of WT chemotaxis to 30 nM CXCL11 % of WT chemotaxis to 30 nM CXCL10 KD CXCL11 binding (nM) KD CXCL10 binding (nM)
WT CXCR3 100 100 100 10.9 ± 5.6 4.7 ± 0.5
D112N 76.8 ± 7.6 80.2 ± 24.5 17.8 ± 1.5*** 3.8 ± 0.7 ND
D195N 74.2 ± 2.1 90.3 ± 19.7 14.7 ± 3.9** 16.0 ± 3.4 4.7 ± 1.1
E196Q 188.0 ± 79.9 76.0 ± 18.9 9.5 ± 4.1** 0.4 ± 0.1 7.6 ± 3.4
D278N 92.6 ± 1.4 80.7 ± 27.6 49.3 ± 5.9* 2.6 ± 1.0 30.9 ± 3.2*
D282N 62.1 ± 26.9 87.5 ± 17.5 84.2 ± 18.9 1.4 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 1.3
E293Q 134.8 ± 16.8 77.6 ± 23.1 49.8 ± 4.4** 3.7 ± 0.9 1.2 ± 0.0*
D297N 90.2 ± 10.4 44.1 ± 6.1* 72.9 ± 25.7 26.3 ± 0.5* 7.1 ± 0.5*

Surface expression and chemotaxis are expressed relative to values obtained for transfectants expressing WT CXCR3. ND indicates not determined. The mean values ± SEM from at least three experiments are shown. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05, significantly different from corresponding values for the WT CXCR3; Student's t-test.