Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun;166(4):1303–1319. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01825.x

Table 1.

dAUC to phenylephrine response between control and experimental situations in endothelium-intact (E+) MRAs from WKY rats and SHR untreated or treated with pioglitazone and in endothelium-denuded segments (E−) of arteries from pioglitazone-treated SHR

SHR + Pio
WKY E+ SHR E+ E+ E−
NS 398 ∼0 ∼0 34.5 ± 6.9# 13.2 ± 3.7+
SQ 29,548 ND ∼0 19.5 ± 3.1# ∼0+
SC 19220 ND ∼0 ∼0 ND
RO 1138452 ND ND ∼0 ND
SQ 29,548 + RO 1138452 ND ND 23.5 ± 5.8 ND
Furegrelate ND ∼0 ∼0 ND
Tranylcypromine ND ∼0 16.0 ± 1.6# ND
Apocynin 14.2 ± 4.2 29.3 ± 4.3* ∼0# ND
Allopurinol ∼0 15.0 ± 2.2* ∼0# ND
L-NAME 51.9 ± 5.4 32.4 ± 4.9* 53.6 ± 4.2# ND

AUCs were calculated from the individual concentration–response curve plots using a computer program (GraphPad Prism Software); the differences are expressed as a percentage of the AUC of the corresponding control situation. ND, not determined.

*P < 0.05 versus WKY rats, #P < 0.05 versus SHR untreated rats, +P < 0.05 versus endothelium-intact arteries by Student's t-test. n= 5–10 animals. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.