Table IV.
Potential contributions of Indigenous knowledge to the specific steps of the conventional risk management process
Knowledge needs in the risk management process | Knowledge contribution from Indigenous knowledge |
---|---|
Risk characterization | |
Confirm identification of hazard | Using own methods of assessing food safety identify deformities, disease, etc. [Note: this will be limited as long-range contaminants cannot be identified following typical assessment (smell, taste, visual) processes.] |
Framing of hazard | Provide context to the issue. |
Risk evaluation (Benefit-risk assessment) | |
Dietary exposure | Identify patterns of consumption. |
Dose-response assessment | Species consumed. |
Mode of preparation. | |
Exposure assessment | Rules of which animals are taken. |
Benefit assessment | Cultural context. |
Risk communication | |
Risk perception | Cultural context and local relevancy. |
Insight on effective modes of communication. | |
Risk options | |
Inform on effective modes of action. | |
Monitoring and evaluation | |
Inform on effectiveness of strategies. | |
Evaluate management process using own criteria of relevancy and success. |