Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 28;10(3):331–337. doi: 10.2450/2012.0081-11

Table III.

Timing, source, quality of information and preference about UCB.

997 blood donors 239 pregnant women 298 female blood donors

N (%) N (%) N (%)

General information about CB 886 (89) 222 (93) 289 (97)
Time of acquiring information
Before pregnancy 156 (75)
During pregnancy Not applicable 53 (25) Not applicable
No response 13
Source of information
Internet 211 (25.3) 56(26.3) 101 (35.5)
Gynaecologist, obstetrician 120 (14.4) 89 (42) 73 (25.7)
Internet + healthcare (associated) 144 (17.3) 20 (9.4) 28 (9.9)
Press 344 (41) 5 (2.3) 78 (27.5)
Other (TV, family, friends, ...) 15 (2) 43 (20) 4 (1.4)
No response 52 9 5
Content of information
1. Knowledge about donation 730 (82) 211 (95) 257 (89)
2. Knowledge on differences between public and private banks 264 (30) 129 (58) 100 (34.6)
3. Knowledge on criteria for selecting units 222 (25) 158 (71) 80 (27.7)
4. Knowledge on current probability of clinical use 184 (21) 92 (41.5) 73 (25)
5. Knowledge on current therapeutic uses 138 (15.6) 88 (39.6) 69*(23.8)
  a) correct 91 (66) 69 (78.4) 39 (56.5)
  b) partly correct 6 (4.3) 11 (12.5) -
  c) wrong 41 (29.7) 8 (9.1) 6 (8.7)
Have consulted the Official website of the Ministry of health 40 (4.5) 24 (11) 17 (6)
Intention to public donation 708 (76) 132 (55) 212 (73)
Intention to private storage 86 (9) 15 (6.5) 35 (12)
Intention to discard 0 68 (28.5) 0
No decision yet 0 24 (10) 0
Both donation and preservation 136 (15) 0 42 (14.5)
No response 67 0 9

Legend: The percentages are calculated on the basis of the number of respondents; 24 (34.8%) female blood donors did not specify any clinical use.