Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 23;1:119–126. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S10621

Table 2.

Results of meta-analysis of the FACT-G raw scale scores

Physical well-being Functional well-being Emotional well-being Social well-being Total FACT-G
Number of contrasts X L X L X L X L X L
  Trivial 40 22 46 26 66 22 112 43 33 14
  Small 97 32 97 36 122 61 95 42 77 37
  Medium 85 33 81 30 44 9 15 1 83 27
  Large 13 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Cross-sectional (X) IWMD 95% CI IWMD 95% CI IWMD 95% CI IWMD 95% CI IWMD 95% CI
  Trivial −0.09 −2.2, 2.0 0.3 −2.0, 2.7 −0.16 −1.5, 1.3 0.1 −1.1, 1.4 −1 −8, 6
  Small 1.9 0.6, 3.2 2.0 0.5, 3.5 1.0 0.1, 2.6 0.7 −0.7, 2.1 6 2, 11
  Medium 4.1 2.7, 5.5 3.8 2.0, 5.5 1.9 0.3, 3.5 0.8 −2.9, 4.5 11 7, 15
  Large 8.7 5.2, 12 8.8 4.3, 13 22 −4, 48
Longitudinal (L) IWMD 95% CI IWMD 95% CI IWMD 95% CI IWMD 95% CI IWMD 95% CI
  Trivial 0.5 −1.1, 2.0 −0.04 −1.8, 1.7 0.3 −1.1, 1.6 0.02 −1.1, 1.1 0.4 −5.5, 6.4
  Small 0.8 −0.4, 2.1 0.7 −0.8, 2.2 1.1 0.3, 1.9 0.17 −0.9, 1.2 2.4 −1.4, 6.1
  Medium 1.5 0.1, 2.9 1.5 −0.2, 3.2 0.6 −1.7, 2.8 0.06 3.3 −1.3, 7.8
  Large 8.2

Note: The scores are from all cross-sectional (X, n = 1,118) informative contrasts and longitudinal (L, n = 436) informative contrasts: number of contrasts and IWMD, with 95% CIs for the 5 FACT-G scales and the 4 size classes.

Abbreviations: FACT-G, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General; IWMDs, inverse-variance weighted mean differences; CIs, confidence intervals.