Skip to main content
. 2004 Jan 27;101(6):1622–1625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2136686100

Table 1. Comparison of tree alternatives for hsp82.

Criteria
Model Tree BP PP KH SH
Nucleotide model, all positions B 0.732 (0.004) 0.900 (0.000) 0.729 (0.004) 0.729 (0.004)
C 0.268 (0.004) 0.100 (0.000) 0.271 (0.004) 0.271 (0.004)
Nucleotide model, codon positions 1 and 2 B 0.408 (0.005) 0.313 (0.000) 0.362 (0.005) 0.362 (0.005)
C 0.592 (0.005) 0.687 (0.000) 0.638 (0.005) 0.638 (0.005)
Nucleotide model, codon position 3 B 0.923 (0.003) 0.998 (0.000) 0.912 (0.003) 0.994 (0.001)
C 0.076 (0.003) 0.002 (0.000) 0.088 (0.003) 0.168 (0.004)
Codon model, estimated frequency B 0.021 (0.001) 5 × 10-11 (0.000) 0.016 (0.001) 0.016 (0.001)
C 0.979 (0.001) 1.000 (0.000) 0.984 (0.001) 0.984 (0.001)
Codon model, equal frequency B 0.362 (0.005) 0.011 (0.000) 0.349 (0.005) 0.349 (0.005)
C 0.638 (0.005) 0.989 (0.000) 0.651 (0.005) 0.651 (0.005)

Tree B has all gene copies diverging after the separation of bdelloid families as in Fig. 1B; in tree C the most divergent copies separate before the bdelloid radiation as in Fig. 1C. Scores are shown for the bootstrap (BP), posterior probability (PP), Kishino-Hasegawa (KH), and Shimodaira-Hasegawa (SH) tests, with standard error in parentheses.