Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Epidemiol. 2012 Jul 16;36(6):631–641. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21658

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The power comparison results of the PRM, CWM, and PCR methods for the first scenario of sparse SNP effect based on different sample sizes (150, 200, 250 and 300) and different minor allele frequencies (0.3, 0.4 and 0.5). The horizontal axis of each plot is the number of phenotypes q and the vertical axis is the power. The dashed line represents a power of 50%.