Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 14;2:576. doi: 10.1038/srep00576

Figure 6. Schematic presentation of the leading invasion process and the corresponding difference of invasion probabilities with and without taking into account the “wisdom of groups”.

Figure 6

Arrows in the top two panels depict the leading invasion process for α = 0 (left) and α = 4 (right). The invasion that is marked by the gray arrow in the right panel becomes practically irrelevant due to large α (see main text for details). The color code is the same as used in Figs. 4 and 5 to distinguish players with different learning activities. Lower panel depicts the normalized difference of invasion probabilities Φ of CD and DC strategy changes in dependence on the temptation to defect b at K = 0.5. It can be observed that for α = 4 the invasion front changes sign at a higher value of b than for α = 0, thus corroborating the reported promotion of cooperation due to the “wisdom of groups” at the microscopic level of the evolutionary process.