Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Addict Res Ther. 2011 Dec 24;Suppl 4:007. doi: 10.4172/2155-6105.S4-007

Table 1.

Presents the amount of time (sec ± SEM) that mice (n = 12/group) spent investigating the constant and novel objects in the novel object recognition task.

Experiment 2 Constant Object Novel Object
Saline (i.c.v.)/Saline (i.p.) 11 ± 2 18 ± 3
Saline (i.c.v.)/U50,488 (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) 16 ± 3 14 ± 2
NXM (30 nmol, i.c.v.)/Saline (i.p.) 8 ± 1 16 ± 2
NXM (30 nmol, i.c.v.)/U50,488 (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) 7 ± 1 16 ± 3
Experiment 3 Constant Object Novel Object
Saline (i.c.v.)/Saline (i.p.) 10 ± 2 22 ± 3
Saline (i.c.v.)/ffir-NH2 (1 mg/kg, i.p.) 12 + 3 22 ± 4
ffir-NH2 (3 nmol, i.c.v.)/Saline (i.p.) 8 ± 1 6 ± 1
ffir-NH2 (3 nmol, i.c.v.)/nor-BNI* (5 mg/kg, i.p.) 11 ± 2 19 ± 3

indicates a main effect wherein naloxone methiodide (NXM)-infused mice significantly differed from saline-infused mice on exploration of the constant object, irrespective of peripheral injection condition (p < 0.05).

indicates a significant interaction wherein mice infused with ffir-NH2 significantly differed from salineinfused controls on exploration of the novel, but not constant, object (p < 0.05).

*

nor-BNI = nor-binaltorphimine