. 2012 Jun;9(2):185–191. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1263.2012.04011

Table 1. MT, LD and MT/LD comparisons of rats in each group (n = 6, mean ± SD).

Grouping	MT(µm)	LD (µm )	MT/LD(%)
Sham-operated	52.15 ± 7.18	525.72 ± 18.58	9.94 ± 1.517
RHR Model	91.28 ± 11.17^a	441.38 ± 14.13	20.75 ± 3.068^a
Amlodipine	72.57 ± 6.42^b	478.10 ± 27.45	15.18 ± 1.051^b
Enalapril	63.23 ± 6.07^c	481.76 ± 62.37	13.26 ± 1.700^c
Combination	61.79 ± 2.20^d,f	481.76 ± 62.38	12.50 ± 1.959^d,e

^aP < 0.01 vs. sham-operated group; ^bP < 0.05, ^cP < 0.01 vs. model group; ^dP > 0.05 vs. Enalapril group; ^eP < 0.05, ^fP < 0.01 vs. Amlodipine group. MT: media thickness; LD: lumen diameter; RHR: renovascular hypertensive rat.