Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep-Oct;46(5):505–513. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.5.505

Table 2.

Intraclass Coefficients (ICCs) for the Comparison of Fitness Tests in Performers (n = 238) Over Time

Time Points Test
Dynamic Balance Lefta Dynamic Balance Righta Handgrip Left Handgrip Right Vertical Jump Pull-Upsa Harvard Step 60-Second Jump
Baseline versus 6 mob 0.23 0.06 0.86 0.86 0.92 0.90 0.58 0.49
Baseline versus 12 mo 0.25 0.29 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.87 0.56 0.39
Baseline versus 18 mo 0.23 0.24 0.85 0.81 0.89 0.84 0.46 0.34
6 mo versus 12 mo 0.50 0.38 0.88 0.90 0.93 0.94 0.67 0.72
6 mo versus 18 mo 0.44 0.35 0.84 0.83 0.94 0.91 0.60 0.66
12 mo versus 18 mo 0.45 0.51 0.88 0.84 0.94 0.94 0.64 0.75
Baseline to 18 mo 0.35 0.31 0.87 0.85 0.92 0.90 0.59 0.53
 (95% confidence interval) (0.28, 0.43) (0.23, 0.41) (0.84, 0.90) (0.82, 0.88) (0.89, 0.94) (0.86, 0.93) (0.52, 0.65) (0.46, 0.60)
6 mo to 18 mo 0.46 0.42 0.87 0.86 0.94 0.93 0.63 0.71
 (95% confidence interval) (0.37, 0.55) (0.33, 0.52) (0.83, 0.90) (0.82, 0.89) (0.90, 0.95) (0.89, 0.96) (0.56, 0.69) (0.66, 0.76)
6 mo to 18 mo,c performers who provided appropriate effort only (n = 215) 0.42 0.46 0.86 0.85 0.93 0.91 0.62 0.71

a ICCs based on log-transformed data because of heteroscedasticity.

b ICCs for each pairwise comparison are provided in the first 6 rows for transparency reasons only; confidence intervals are omitted to improve clarity.

c Comparison to assess possible learning effects. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the bootstrap percentile method.22