Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 25;5:149. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-149

Table 5.

Null model and the top five models for nymph abundance

  Model 0 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
Fixed effect
Coefficient (Std. Error)
Intercept
3.29 (0.39)***
3.77 (1.14)***
3.94 (1.38)**
1.87 (1.05).
−13.29 (5.35)*
−16.28 (5.60)**
Level–1 : Sampling
 
 
 
 
 
 
Daily wind speed (7 previous days mean)
 
−0.33 (0.01)*
 
 
−0.30 (0.15)*
 
Daily relative humidity (sampling day)
 
 
−0.02 (0.01).
 
−0.02 (0.01).
−0.02 (0.01).
Daily maximum temperature (sampling day)
 
 
 
0.03 (0.02).
 
 
Level–2 : Site
 
 
 
 
 
 
Euclidean mean nearest-neighbour distance (ra = 500 m)
 
−0.02 (0.01)***
−0.02 (0.00)***
−0.02 (0.01)*
−0.03 (0.01)***
−0.03 (0.01) **
Area-weighted mean forest shape index (r = 1500 m)
 
1.01 (0.21)***
1.10 (0.23)***
1.06 (0.22)*
 
 
Area-weighted mean patch fractal dimension (r = 1500 m)
 
 
 
 
18.63 (4.32)***
20.50 (4.65).
Random effect
Variance (Std. Error)
Intercept
5.46 (0.21)
1.32 (0.10)
2.00 (0.13)
1.73 (0.12)
1.62 (0.11)
2.17 (0.13)
AIC
1433.25
1391.81
1393.49
1393.92
1394.68
1396.54
ΔAIC 0 41.44 39.76 39.33 38.56 36.71

a r : Buffer zone radius.

***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; .P < 0.1.