Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;7(8):e43307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043307

Table 5. Performance characteristics of the Xpert MTB/RIF test stratified by participant TB treatment status, using MGIT culture as the reference standarda.

No current or prior TB treatment Current TB treatment Prior but not current TB treatment
N = 5764b N = 58 N = 797
Xpert sensitivity N/N 96/155 4/4 17/28
% (95% CI) 61.9 (53.8, 69.6) 100 (39.8, 100.0) 60.7 (40.6, 78.5)
Xpert specificity N/N 5599/5609 46/54 760/769
% (95% CI) 99.8 (99.7, 99.9) 85.2 (72.9, 93.4) 98.8 (97.8, 99.5)
Xpert PPV N/N 96/106 4/12 17/26
% (95% CI) 90.6 (83.3, 95.4) 33.3 (9.9, 65.1) 65.4 (44.3, 82.8)
Xpert NPV N/N 5599/5658 46/46 760/771
% (95% CI) 99.0 (98.7, 99.2) 100.0 (92.3, 100.0) 98.6 (97.5, 99.3)
Agreement between Xpert and MGIT N/N 5695/5764 50/58 777/797
% (95% CI) 98.8 (98.5, 99.1) 86.2 (74.6, 93.9) 97.5 (96.2, 98.5)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MGIT, Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

a

Excluded from the analyses were 249 specimens that were contaminated in MGIT culture, 23 specimens that had a final result of failed on Xpert MTB/RIF testing, and 2 specimens from participants for whom data on TB treatment status were missing.

b

four participants who reported not being on current TB treatment but did not know if they had ever been on TB treatment were coded as “no current or prior TB treatment”.