Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 28;4(7):302–310. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i7.302

Table 2.

Detection rate

Tri-Gd T1 SSFP fs-FSE DWI Consensus
All FLLs 277
Reader 1 266 (96) 161 (58) 187 (68) 234 (84)
Reader 2 256 (92) 185 (67) 185 (67) 222 (80)
Mean 261 (84) 186 (67) 186 (67) 228 (82)
Benignant 135
Reader 1 134 (99) 89 (66) 89 (66) 116 (86)
Reader 2 127 (94) 88 (65) 88 (65) 105 (78)
Mean 130.5 (97) 88.5 (66) 88.5 (66) 110.5 (82)
Malignant 142
Reader 1 132 (93) 99 (70) 99 (70) 118 (83)
Reader 2 129 (91) 97 (68) 97 (68) 114 (80)
Mean 130.5 (92) 98 (69) 98 (69) 116 (82)
Metastases 114
Reader 1 104 (91) 82 (72) 82 (72) 100 (88)
Reader 2 101 (89) 79 (69) 79 (69) 97 (85)
Mean 102.5 (90) 80.5 (71) 80.5 (71) 98.5 (86)
HCC 28
Reader 1 28 (100) 17 (60) 17 (60) 18 (64)
Reader 2 28 (100) 18 (64) 18 (64) 17 (60)
Mean 28 (100) 17.5 (62) 17.5 (62) 17.5 (62)

Detection rate observed by triphasic gadolinium-enhanced T1 sequences (Tri-Gd T1), steady-state free precession (SSFP), fat-suppressed fast spin-echo (fs-FSE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. The values are divided according to the different categories of lesions analyzed in the study. HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; FLLs: Focal liver lesions.