Table 3.
Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analyses Examining Main and Moderating Effects of Romantic Partner Characteristics on Adolescents' Popularity, Body Appeal, and Physical Attractiveness at Time 2
Popularity |
Body Appeal |
Physical Attractiveness |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | |
Step 1 | ||||||
T1 Adolescent (A) Functioning | .87*** | .76*** | .91*** | .80*** | .71*** | .65*** |
Step 2 | ||||||
T1 Best Friend Functioning | .14 | .01 | .07 | .01 | .20 | .03 |
Step 3 | ||||||
T1 Romantic Partner (RP) Functioning | .08 | .00 | .12 | .01 | −.02 | .00 |
Step 4 | ||||||
T1 A × RP Functioning | −.22 | .02** | .05 | .00 | −.07 | .00 |
Total R2 | .79*** | .82*** | .68*** |
Note: At each step, ΔR2 presented is for the step and β presented is for the final model
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.