Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2008 Nov-Dec;79(6):1676–1692. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01218.x

Table 3.

Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analyses Examining Main and Moderating Effects of Romantic Partner Characteristics on Adolescents' Popularity, Body Appeal, and Physical Attractiveness at Time 2

Popularity
Body Appeal
Physical Attractiveness
β ΔR2 β ΔR2 β ΔR2
Step 1
 T1 Adolescent (A) Functioning .87*** .76*** .91*** .80*** .71*** .65***
Step 2
 T1 Best Friend Functioning .14 .01 .07 .01 .20 .03
Step 3
 T1 Romantic Partner (RP) Functioning .08 .00 .12 .01 −.02 .00
Step 4
 T1 A × RP Functioning −.22 .02** .05 .00 −.07 .00
Total R2 .79*** .82*** .68***

Note: At each step, ΔR2 presented is for the step and β presented is for the final model

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure