Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2008 Nov-Dec;79(6):1676–1692. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01218.x

Table 4.

Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analyses Examining Main and Moderating Effects of Romantic Partner Characteristics on Adolescents' Depression, Aggression, and Victimization at Time 2

PR Sadness
SR Depression
Relational Aggression
Physical Aggression
Relational Victimization
Physical Victimization
β ΔR2 β ΔR2 β ΔR2 β ΔR2 β ΔR2 β ΔR2
Step 1
 T1 Adolescent (A) Functioning .40*** .05* .49*** .54*** .12 .13*** .88*** .83*** .53*** .15*** .32** .09**
Step 2
 T1 Best Friend Functioning .08 .02 .17 .04* .32*** .09*** .08 .00 .18* .03* .04 .00
Step 3
 T1 Romantic Partner (RP) Functioning .52** .01 .12 .01 .01 .01 −.06 .00 .11 .00 .12 .01
Step 4
 T1 A × RP Functioning .52** .06** .23* .03* .29** .06* −.03 .00 .25* .03* .07 .00
Total R2 .14** .62*** .29*** .83*** .21*** .10*

Note: At each step, ΔR2 presented is for the step and β presented is for the final model

SR = self-rated; PR = peer-rated

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure