Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 7;2012:245819. doi: 10.1155/2012/245819

Table 2.

Correlation of cathepsin D expression at MTB with clinico-pathological features.

Clinico-pathological parameters No. of cases (%)1 neg/weak (%)2 Moderate (%)2 Strong (%)2 P value3
Age 0.139
 <65 35 (29) 14 (40) 14 (40) 7 (20)
 ≥65 84 (71) 50 (60) 21 (25) 13 (15)
Gender 0.586
 F 59 (50) 30 (51) 17 (29) 12 (20)
 M 60 (50) 34 (57) 18 (30) 8 (13)
Tumor location 0.072
 Colon 82 (69) 49 (60) 19 (23) 14 (17)
 Rectum 37 (31) 15 (41) 16 (43) 6 (16)
Histological type 0.177
 Nonmucinous 102 (86) 52 (51) 33 (32) 17 (17)
 Mucinous 16 (14) 12 (75) 2 (13) 2 (13)
Histological grade 0.211
 High grade 95 (81) 47 (50) 31 (33) 17 (18)
 Low grade 23 (19) 16 (70) 4 (17) 3 (13)
Vascular invasion 0.400
 Negative 90 (76) 51 (57) 26 (29) 13 (14)
 Positive 29 (24) 13 (45) 9 (31) 7 (24)
Perineural invasion 0.839
 Negative 109 (92) 59 (54) 32 (29) 18 (17)
 Positive 9 (8) 4 (44) 3 (33) 2 (22)
TNM stages 0.064
 I 20 (17) 12 (60) 5 (25) 3 (15)
 II 42 (36) 27 (64) 10 (24) 5 (12)
 III 34 (29) 18 (53) 13 (38) 3 (9)
 IV 21 (18) 7 (33) 6 (29) 8 (38)
Distant metastasis 0.038
 No 89 (75) 52 (58) 27 (30) 10 (11)
 Yes 29 (25) 12 (41) 8 (28) 9 (31)
Nodal status 0.358
 Negative 66 (58) 38 (58) 16 (24) 12 (18)
 Positive 47 (42) 24 (51) 17 (36) 6 (13)
Depth of invasion 0.935
 T1/T2 23 (20) 13 (57) 7 (30) 3 (13)
 T3/T4 93 (80) 51 (55) 27 (29) 15 (16)
5-year recurrence4 0.090
 Recurrence free 58 (79) 40 (69) 14 (24) 4 (7)
 Recurrence 15 (21) 6 (40) 6 (40) 3 (20)

1Percentage of the column.

2Percentage of the row.

3 P value based on Pearson's χ 2 test; P ≤ 0.05.

4Presence or absence of local or distant metachronous recurrence within 5-year followup.

Significant correlation between expression of cathepsin D at MTB with distant metastasis.