Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 16;8(8):e1002625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002625

Figure 6. Limit functions of the corrected m-Tau function.

Figure 6

The corrected m-Tau -function Inline graphic responds similar to Inline graphic, but with an improved noise suppression performance, as long as parameter values Inline graphic (Inline graphic and Inline graphic) are suitably chosen. More precisely, Inline graphic is constrained by the limit functions Inline graphic and Inline graphic. This means that corrected m-Tau can approach the former or the latter function for the corresponding (extreme) values of Inline graphic, but typically Inline graphic will perform somewhere between the two limit functions. For the simulations shown in this figure, uncorrelated normal-distributed noise was added to the angular variables Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Each curve represents a typical random trial, where noise was identical for all curves. The different shades of gray indicate different object diameters, as indicated in the legends. (a) “Normal” Inline graphic function, which is the limit function approached by Inline graphic for Inline graphic. Noise suppression is poor. Notice that the displayed range has been truncated so as to match it to the range of the figure on the right-hand side. (b) The Inline graphic function is the limit function that is approached for Inline graphic. It has an excellent noise suppression performance, owing to lowpass filtering of angular variables (Inline graphic, c.f. equation 4). Further details are presented in Text S3.