Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 16;8(8):e1002625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002625

Figure 8. Corrected m-Tau predictions (Inline graphic score; combined diameter).

Figure 8

The proportion of later responses (i.e. subjects perceived ttc after Inline graphic) are shown as a function of ttc for different presentation times Inline graphic: (a) Inline graphic, (b) Inline graphic, (c) Inline graphic, (d) Inline graphic, and (e) Inline graphic. Psychophysical results Inline graphic were pooled across subjects and are denoted by circles (small object diameter Inline graphic) and triangles (big object diameter Inline graphic), respectively. Predictions Inline graphic of the corrected m-Tau -model “Inline graphic” are represented by curves. In this figure, the prediction performance of Inline graphic was measured according to the root mean square error (“Inline graphic-score”). Corrected m-Tau -predictions with the three best performing parameter sets are juxtaposed (i.e. first three rows in Table S3 in Text S5 with smallest Inline graphic-score). Thinner and darker lines represent a better prediction performance. Furthermore, continuous curves are the Inline graphic-predictions for small (thus should match the circles), while dashed curves correspond to big (should match the triangles). Here, the same set of Inline graphic-parameters was used for both object diameters (“combined diameter”). The light-shaded areas correspond to the variability of simulated responses (Inline graphic SD, see Methods Section): Yellowish shading for small, and bluish shading for big.