Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug;50(8):2585–2591. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00523-12

Table 2.

Performance of different methods assorted due to EORTC/MSG classification

EORTC/MSG classification (n)a IHE-PF
IHE-HHQ
UCP-PF
UCP-HHQ
No. of serum GM positive-patients (%)
No. of detected patients (%) No. of positive PCR specimens by result type b
No. of detected patients (%) No. of positive PCR specimens by result type
No. of detected patients (%) No. of positive PCR specimens by result type
No. of detected patients (%) No. of positive PCR specimens by result type
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
Probable IA (3) 2 (66.7) 3 1 1 (33.3) 1 1 3 (100.0) 5 3 (100.0) 1 5 2 (66.7)
Possible IA (18) 3 (16.7) 2 1 4 (22.2) 4 1 8 (44.4) 5 2 2 8 (44.4) 6 2 4 0 (0)
Unclassified (41) 5 (12.2) 5 8 (19.5) 9 13 (31.7) 12 3 7 (17.1) 7 2 0 (0)
a

n, number of patients.

b

For triplicate PCRs, result types are indicated as follows: 1, single positive replicate; 2, two positive replicates; 3, three positive replicates.