Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep;50(9):2888–2893. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00989-12

Table 3.

Anti-HEV in northwest of France according to age, activity, and regiona

Characteristic No. (%) of subjects
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Total in group Positive OR (95% CI) P trend AOR (95% CI) P trend
Age (yr)
    <34 171 23 (13.5) 1 1
    34–42 177 40 (22.6) 1.88 (1.07–3.30) 0.028 1.76 (0.98–3.13) 0.057
    43–49 178 64 (36.0) 3.61 (2.12–6.17) <10−4 3.21 (1.85–5.59) <10−4
    ≥50 202 84 (41.6) 4.58 (2.72–7.71) <10−4 4.54 (2.64–7.84) <10−4
Activity
    Controls 135 26 (19.2) 1 1
    Game and fishing keepers/rangers 130 26 (20.0) 1.05 (0.57–1.92) 0.879 1.18 (0.63–2.24) 0.606
    Silviculturists 105 26 (24.8) 1.38 (0.75–2.55) 0.306 1.24 (0.64–2.39) 0.518
    Woodcutters 358 133 (37.2) 2.48 (1.54–3.99) <10−4 2.24 (1.33–3.77) 0.003
Region
    Champagne-Ardenne 89 11 (12.4) 1 1
    Bourgogne 121 21 (17.4) 1.49 (0.68–3.27) 0.321 0.75 (0.33–1.69) 0.486
    Franche-Comté 84 19 (22.6) 2.07 (0.92–4.67) 0.078 1.24 (0.60–2.53) 0.563
    Alsace 177 78 (44.1) 5.59 (2.78–11.22) <10−4 2.66 (1.49–4.76) <10−4
    Lorraine 250 82 (32.8) 3.46 (1.75–6.86) <10−3 1.96 (1.12–3.42) 0.019
a

OR, odds ratio; AOR, odds ratio adjusted for age, activity, and region. Entries for which the P values were <0.05 are in bold type.