Table 2.
Distribution of the different M. tuberculosis families and drug susceptibility patterns in four provinces of South Africa
| Province | DST result | No. of Isolates | Spoligotype (n) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | EAI1_SOM | T1 | S | LAM3 | LAM4 | LAM9 | LAM11_ZWE | LAM10_CAM | LAM and S/convergent | X1 | X2 | X3 | H1 | H3 | T2-S | T2-T3 | T3 | T3_ETH | Manu1 | Manu2 | Unknown | |||
| Mpumalanga | MDR | 191 | 37 | 49 | 31 | 24 | 6 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 21 | |||
| Pre-XDR | 23 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| XDR | 21 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Gauteng | MDR | 45 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||
| Pre-XDR | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| XDR | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| North-West | MDR | 27 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Pre-XDR | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| XDR | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Limpopo | MDR | 17 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Pre-XDR | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| XDR | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||