Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Mar 26;52(4):1046–1060. doi: 10.1021/ci200620h

Table 1.

Virtual screening results using all protein pharmacophore elements (FPP). EF1: enrichment factors at 1% ranked decoys; EF10: enrichment factors at 10% ranked decoys; EF20: enrichment factors at 20% ranked decoys; AUC: area under the ROC curve. The number of protein pharmacophores and the runtime (seconds) per ligand needed in virtual screening are also shown for each system. The virtual screening was run on a single core of either 2.5GHz quad-core AMD2380 or 2.1GHz 12-core AMD6172 processors. On average, running the virtual screening on AMD2380 is faster than running on AMD6172 by about 18%.

fXa:1F0S fXa:1MQ6 fXa:1NFU HIVPR:1AJV pcDHFR:1DAJ
EF1 29.7 12.2 18.2 9.3 2.0
EF10 6.4 5.6 6.7 4.7 1.5
EF20 3.8 3.5 3.9 3.5 1.3
AUC 0.84 0.81 0.87 0.81 0.51
# of Protein Pharmacophores 148 139 149 131 160
Runtime per ligand (s) 1225 1468 1206 934 896