Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Mar 26;52(4):1046–1060. doi: 10.1021/ci200620h

Table 2.

Number of protein pharmacophore elements selected for virtual screening using different pharmacophore models. “posHS” models were constructed using the hydration sites with positive estimated free energies. The hydration sites were also ranked in a descending order based on their estimated free energies. Top 25% (T0.25), 50% (T0.50), 75% (T0.75) and all (allHS) of the hydration sites were used to build hydration-site-restricted pharmacophore models. Two distance cutoffs, 1.0 Å and 1.5 Å, were used to select protein pharmacophore elements. The total number of protein pharmacophore elements in the binding site, i.e. the full protein pharmacophore (FPP) model, is also shown.

fXa:1F0S (20)* fXa:1MQ6 (33) fXa:1NFU (30) HIVPR:1AJV (26) pcDHFR:1DAJ (27)
Distance Cutoff (Å) 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5

posHS 7 16 9 25 8 18 8 15 16 30
T0.25 5 12 3 10 3 8 4 6 4 10
T0.50 7 16 7 18 6 11 6 12 7 17
T0.75 10 20 9 25 8 18 8 15 12 26
allHS 10 23 11 32 13 27 13 22 18 35

FPP 148 139 149 131 160
*

The values in the parentheses indicate the number of hydration sites identified for each protein system.