Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul 11;154(3):452–459.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.03.032

Table 3.

Factors Associated with Costliest 5% Recipients of Glaucoma Care Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis

Variable ORa 95% C.I.b P-value
Region
 Midwest vs. North East 0.65 (0.53, 0.78) <0.0001
 South East vs. North East 0.78 (0.66, 0.93) 0.0064
 West vs. North East 0.81 (0.64, 1.01) 0.0639
DR (NPDR or PDR)c (dxd in first 2 years) 1.97 (1.65, 2.34) <0.0001
AMDe (dx in first 2 years) 1.38 (1.15, 1.64) 0.0004
Cataract (surgery in first 2 years) 1.59 (1.31, 1.94) <0.0001
Pseudophakia/Aphakia (dx in first 2 years) 1.87 (1.59, 2.20) <0.0001
Age at enrollment (Per 5 year increments) 0.91 (0.88, 0.94) <0.0001
a

OR - odds ratio;

b

C.I. - confidence interval

c

DR-diabetic retinopathy; NPDR-non-proliferative; PDR-proliferative

d

dx - diagnosis

e

AMD-age-related macular degeneration includes exudative or nonexudative macular degeneration

The following covariates were dropped from the model because they were not statistically significant at the p< 0.05 level: race, sex, level of education, household net worth, Charlson co-morbidity index score, and indicators for diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, dementia, and depression.