Table 2.
N | % with ultrasound services | % with biopsy services | % affiliated with academic medical center | % for profitb | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of facilities | 139 | 89.9 | 61.2 | 10.1 | 32.3 |
Educationa | |||||
Non-vulnerable | 107 | 88.8 | 61.7 | 10.3 | 34.0 |
Vulnerable | 32 | 93.8 | 59.4 | 9.4 | 25.9 |
Race/ethnicitya | |||||
Non-vulnerable | 113 | 88.5 | 61.1 | 9.7 | 34.6 |
Vulnerable | 26 | 96.2 | 61.5 | 11.5 | 21.7 |
Rural/urban residenceac | |||||
Non-vulnerable | 92 | 89.1 | 56.5 | 13.0 | 45.0 |
Vulnerable | 47 | 91.5 | 70.2 | 4.3 | 10.6 |
Incomeac | |||||
Non-vulnerable | 87 | 87.4 | 59.8 | 13.8 | 37.7 |
Vulnerable | 52 | 94.2 | 63.5 | 3.9 | 24.0 |
Composite vulnerability scored | |||||
0 | 58 | 82.8 | 48.3 | 15.5 | 51.9 |
1 | 35 | 97.1 | 77.1 | 5.7 | 15.2 |
2 | 22 | 95.5 | 72.7 | 4.6 | 16.7 |
3 | 18 | 94.4 | 77.8 | 11.0 | 33.3 |
4 | 6 | 83.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Facilities serving vulnerable women include those serving: < 83% of the facility population completed high school; > 30% of the facility population are minorities; average percentage of rural residences among the facility population is > 52%; and average median household income among the facility population is < $45,000.
% among facilities not missing ‘for profit’ status (12 facilities were missing this information)
Rural residence and income are generated from area-level data
Composite vulnerability scores were calculated by adding 1 for each of the vulnerability indices met.