Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Attach Hum Dev. 2012;14(5):439–452. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2012.706391

Table 1.

Bivariate correlations of dependent variables with caregiver and child variables

Und 3 Und 6 Und 9 RF 3 RF 6 RF 9 CG Inc. CG Edu. CG Age Child Age
Und 3 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Und 6 .45** 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Und 9 .55** .06 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
RF 3 .25 .25 .25 1 -- -- -- -- -- --
RF 6 .30 .52** .08 .51** 1 -- -- -- -- --
RF 9 .24 .21 .41** .37* .44** 1 -- -- -- --
CG Inc. .24 .02 .09 .21 −.02 .17 1 -- -- --
CG Edu. .34** .32* .32* .16 .42** .45** .49** 1 -- --
CG age .42** .50** .35* .17 .28 .18 .03 .25 1 --
Child age .02 .08 −.01 .01 −.11 −.15 −.15 −.11 −.01 1
*

= p value > .05;

**

= p value >.01

Note: Und 3 = caregivers’ understanding at session 3; Und 6 = caregivers’ understanding at session 6; Und 9 = caregiver’s understanding at session 9; RF 3 = caregiver’s reflective functioning at session 3; RF 6 = caregiver’s reflective functioning at session 6; RF 9 = caregiver’s reflective functioning at session 9; CG inc. = caregiver’s income; CG edu. = caregiver’s education; CG age = caregiver’s age.