Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 28;19(5):800–808. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000775

Table 3.

Performance (F1 score) of the classifiers for identifying the discourse connectives

BioDRB ∩ PDTB BioDRB ∉ PDTB BioDRB ∅ PDTB
% Of conns Performance as DCONN Performance as non-DCONN % Of conns Performance as DCONN Performance as Non DCONN % Of conns Performance as DCONN Performance as non-DCONN
Cross-domain 96.7% 0.62 0.92 3.3% 0.03 0.97 0% 0 0.86
UnWeighted 84.3% 0.70 0.93 10.5% 0.21 0.98 5.2% 0.55 0.91
In-domain 74% 0.78 0.94 19.8% 0.65 0.98 6.2% 0.63 0.91
Weighted 75.7% 0.75 0.94 17% 0.51 0.98 7.3% 0.7 0.92
Pruning 93.4% 0.67 0.93 3.3% 0.08 0.97 3.3% 0.14 0.87
FeatAugment 72.8% 0.70 0.93 21% 0.58 0.98 6.2% 0.5 0.9
Weighted-Pruning 75.3% 0.77 0.94 18.5% 0.60 0.98 6.2% 0.63 0.91
Weighted-FeatAugment 72.6% 0.77 0.94 20.2% 0.67 0.98 7.2% 0.7 0.92
Hybrid 74.4% 0.78 0.94 19.5% 0.66 0.98 6.1% 0.67 0.92
Weighted-Hybrid 73.8% 0.78 0.94 20.2% 0.65 0.98 6% 0.67 0.92

BioDRB, Biomedical Discourse Relation Bank; PDTB, Penn Discourse Treebank.