Skip to main content
. 2012 May 29;9:63. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-63

Table 4.

Effects on determinants for PA and SB mid-way and post intervention

  Control Intervention  
 
Mean
95% CI
Mean
95% CI
p
Mid-way
 
 
 
 
 
Enjoyment
4.07
(4.03, 4.12)
4.15
(4.10, 4.21)
.03
Self-efficacy
3.94
(3.90, 3.98)
4.01
(3.95, 4.06)
.05
Perceived social support from parents
2.44
(2.40, 2.49)
2.43
(2.37, 2.49)
.77
Perceived social support from teachers
1.63
(1.58, 1.67)
1.73
(1.67, 1.78)
.003
Post-intervention
 
 
 
 
 
Enjoyment
3.95
(3.90, 4.00)
3.89
(3.82, 3.96)
.19
Self-efficacy
3.86
(3.81, 3.91)
3.76
(3.70, 3.83)
.02
Social support from parents
2.31
(2.26, 2.36)
2.24
(2.18, 2.31)
.10
Social support from teachers
1.48
(1.44, 1.52)
1.59
(1.54, 1.65)
.001
Social support from friends
2.80
(2.74, 2.86)
2.82
(2.74, 2.90)
.76
Environmental opportunities for PA
4.12
(4.07, 4.18)
4.21
(4.13, 4.28)
.08
Parental regulation TV-viewing
3.42
(3.35, 3.48)
3.37
(3.29, 3.46)
.40
Parental regulation computer/game-use
3.28
(3.21, 3.34)
3.30
(3.21, 3.39)
.68
Social inclusion at school 4.36 (4.31, 4.40) 4.33 (4.27, 4.39) .47

PA = Physical activity, SB = Sedentary behavior, CI = Confidence intervals.

One-way Ancova analyses.

Adjusted for baseline values of determinants.

Sample: Norwegian adolescents 11-13 year-olds from the HEIA study.