Table 2.
Domain |
Score |
Mean score (SD) |
Median score |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | Da | Ea | |||
Eligibility criteria |
74 |
83 |
0 |
80 |
50 |
57 (35) |
74 |
Flexibility of the experimental intervention |
64 |
86 |
85 |
50 |
100 |
77 (20) |
85 |
Practitioner expertise (experimental) |
45 |
100 |
92 |
100 |
90 |
85 (23) |
92 |
Flexibility of the comparison intervention |
64 |
80 |
80 |
50 |
60 |
67 (13) |
64 |
Practitioner expertise (comparison) |
45 |
98 |
90 |
100 |
100 |
87 (24) |
98 |
Follow-up intensity |
61 |
89 |
50 |
100 |
70 |
74 (20) |
70 |
Outcome |
79 |
58 |
75 |
100 |
100 |
82 (19) |
79 |
Participant compliance |
86 |
84 |
20 |
100 |
80 |
74 (31) |
84 |
Practitioner adherence |
59 |
77 |
70 |
50 |
80 |
67 (13) |
70 |
Primary analysis | 74 | 92 | 20 | 50 | 80 | 63 (29) | 74 |
A to E represent the members of the trial management group. Scores were transformed onto a 0 to 100 scale with 0 representing the most extreme explanatory end of each domain and 100 representing the most extreme pragmatic end. aD and E scored the pragmatism of the trial on each domain out of 10 rather than opting to complete a PRECIS wheel.