Table 4.

Comparison of Reflection and Discourse/Articulation Scores in Analysis Groups of both Treatment Conditions at 3 months (N=501)^*

	n	Median Score (Q1, Q3)	U Statistic	Z Statistic	p
Treatment Group
Reflection**
IR-IR†	71	4 (2, 4)
IR-RR	164	4 (3, 4)	4673.5	−2.54	0.011‡
Less Risk	92	4 (3, 4)
No Risk	72	4 (4, 5)	2390.0	−3.24	0.001‡
Discourse***
IR-IR	71	3 (1, 4)
IR-RR	163	3 (2, 5)	5075.0	−1.53	0.126
Less Risk	92	3 (2, 4)
No Risk	71	4 (2, 5)	2966.5	−1.03	0.305
Control Group
Reflection**
IR-IR	90	4 (3, 4)
IR-RR	173	4 (3, 4)	7629.0	−0.284	0.777
Less Risk	115	4 (3, 4)
No Risk	58	4 (3, 4)	3087.0	−0.856	0.392
Discourse***
IR-IR	90	3 (2, 4)
IR-RR	173	3 (2, 4)	7305.0	−0.841	0.400
Less Risk	115	3 (2, 4)
No Risk	58	3.5 (3, 4)	2954.5	−1.26	0.209

^*Included missing values were less than %1 of total. Excludes those with 0 UAI partners at baseline.

^†IR-IR (Baseline Risk - Remained at Risk), IR-RR (Baseline Risk - Reduced Risk).

^‡Sample sizes vary in the treatment group (baseline risk, reduced risk) due to refusals to answer. Significance for Mann-Whitney = 0.05.

^**Reflection was assessed with the following question on 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree) at 3-months: Over the last 3 months, I thought about the ideas contained in Sexpulse (Sexpulse substituted with “the surveys” for Control).

^***Discourse was assessed with the following question on 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree) at 3-months: Over the last 3 months, I talked about the ideas in Sexpulse with at least one other person (Sexpulse substituted with “the surveys” for Control).