Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Educ Prev. 2011 Feb;23(1):13–24. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2011.23.1.13

Table 5.

Binary Logistic Regression Assessing Reflection and Discourse/Articulation Scores in 2 Treatment & Control Subgroupsa at 3 months (N=501)*

IR-RR vs. IR-IR No Risk vs. Less Risk**

n OR (95% CI) n OR (95% CI)
Treatment Group 234 163
 Reflection 1.35 (1.01, 1.81) 1.71 (1.18, 2.50)
 Discourse 1.04 (0.83, 1.30) 0.92 (0.71, 1.18)

Control Group 263 173
 Reflection 1.02 (0.77, 1.35) 1.06 (0.73, 1.56)
 Discourse 1.07 (0.88, 1.31) 1.14 (0.89, 1.47)
*

Included missing values were less than %1 of total. Excludes those with 0 UAI partners at baseline.

a

Excludes those with 0 UAI partners at baseline.

IR-IR (Baseline Risk - Remained at Risk), IR-RR (Baseline Risk - Reduced Risk),

**

Includes only IR-RR participants.

Sample sizes vary due to refusals to answer; significant at p<0.05.